Monitoring and Safety Issues for the Pediatric Patient
The complexity of monitoring applied to pediatric patients must
be consistent with the severity of the underlying medical condition and the planned
surgical procedure. My philosophy is that if I would place an arterial line or central
venous line in an adult undergoing a particular operation, the same should be carried
out for a child or infant.
Routine Monitoring and Safety Issues
Minimal monitoring during anesthesia should include a precordial
or esophageal stethoscope, a blood pressure cuff, an electrocardiogram, a temperature
probe, a pulse oximeter, an end-tidal carbon dioxide monitor, and if possible, an
anesthetic concentration analyzer. The noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP) cuff is
particularly useful because frequent blood pressure readings can be taken even when
the anesthesiologist is preoccupied with other tasks. The end-tidal carbon dioxide
monitor, NIBP cuff, and pulse oximeter all provide an early warning of impending
disaster that may go unobserved until the appearance of late clinical signs such
as cyanosis, bradycardia, severe hypotension, or the absence of breath sounds. Simultaneous
loss of the pulse oximeter signal and an inability to measure blood pressure usually
indicate low or no cardiac output. If the pulse oximeter continues to function but
the NIBP cuff has changed from measuring to nonmeasuring, the likelihood of hypovolemia
or anesthetic overdose must be immediately addressed.
The pulse oximeter has a frequent occurrence of false alarms from
movement artifact, light interference, and electrocautery. The new generation of
pulse oximetry software and new devices should minimize these artifacts, but because
they continue to function in very low-flow states and because the software is designed
to read through motion, we may no longer be able to use the pulse oximeter as a rapid
determinant of perfusion.
Capnography is the gold standard for confirmation of successful
endotracheal intubation. However, the capnograph is useful in a number of other
ways. Changes in the shape or the magnitude of the CO2
waveform may indicate
bronchospasm, endobronchial intubation, a kinked endotracheal tube, or low pulmonary
blood flow. One of the main drawbacks of capnography in small children is the inaccuracy
of the recording obtained when using nonrebreathing circuits. The best method of
avoiding artifact is to sample the expired gases at some point within the endotracheal
tube[301]
[302]
or to use the circle system even in small infants.[303]
In general, the concentration of carbon dioxide in expired gases is within 2 to
3 mm Hg of that in arterial blood. However, severe pulmonary disease or atelectasis
may produce a large difference in these two values. In this type of patient, the
gradient between arterial and expired carbon dioxide levels may be used to estimate
the severity of shunting. When such shunts exist, measurement of expired carbon
dioxide levels may be used only to monitor trends. Ultimately, the most important
monitors are the eyes, ears, and hands of the anesthesiologist, who must gather all
the information provided by the patient and by the monitors applied to the patient,
consolidate the information into an accurate picture, and respond accordingly.
Prospective studies have shown that children younger than 6 months
have a more frequent occurrence of critical events.[80]
[304]
[305]
[306]
[307]
The incidence of critical events was several
times higher in American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 3 and
4 patients than in ASA physical status 1 and 2 patients. In some studies, these
events occurred with greater frequency and severity when oximetry was not available
to the anesthesiologist.[304]
[305]
A number of factors may account for these results: the high metabolic rate of small
children, the technical difficulty of caring for infants, the difficulty of estimating
actual delivered ventilation when a variety of circuit configurations are available,
and unfamiliarity in taking care of small children. The POCA registry, a voluntary
reporting system from 63 hospitals, reported cardiac arrests in children 18 years
or younger.[80]
The estimated incidence of cardiac
arrest was 1.4 ± 0.45 per 10,000 cases. Of the 289 cases
collected over a 4-year period, 150 were thought to be related to anesthesia and
83 occurred in children younger than 12 months (55%). Emergency procedures and ASA
status of 3 or higher were predictive of mortality. Of the anesthesia-related cardiac
arrests, 55 were believed to be related to medications, and halothane alone or in
combination with other drugs was associated with 37 of these events. It should be
noted that two were associated with sevoflurane and that at the time of data collection,
sevoflurane had not been widely used in the United States. The use of high inspired
concentrations of halothane (≥3%) accounted for 14 of the arrests, and other associated
factors were controlled ventilation (n = 18) and
difficult intravenous access (n = 4). The most common
preceding events were bradycardia and hypotension (n
= 25). Three infants had unrecognized cardiomyopathy and one had congenital heart
disease. Airway-related events accounted for only 20% of cases, and most involved
airway obstruction and laryngospasm. Several lessons can be taken from these data:
(1) children younger than 1 year are particularly vulnerable to adverse events in
the perioperative period; (2) although halothane was commonly associated with cardiac
arrest, it appears that high inspired concentrations and controlled ventilation contributed
further; (3) high inspired concentrations of inhaled drugs should be avoided until
intravenous access is established; (4) it is not the drug but the way the drug is
used that is most likely the major contributing factor to these arrests; (5) particular
attention should be paid to frequent monitoring of blood pressure and heart rate
during induction; (6) in contrast to earlier studies, pulse oximetry and capnography
monitoring may have reduced the incidence of airway-related events that were avoidable;
and (7) children with congenital heart disease are particularly vulnerable to the
cardiac depressant effects of potent inhaled drugs. One study that supports these
conclusions was a multi-institutional, highly controlled drug trial that compared
remifentanil-based anesthesia with halothane-based
anesthesia for pyloromyotomy.[203]
[204]
In this study of 60 infants (38 who received remifentanil and 22, halothane), no
cases of significant bradycardia, no differences in hemodynamic variables, and no
differences in extubation times, postanesthesia care unit time, or adverse events
were noted. Basically, no difference was found between halothane (a slow-onset,
slow-offset potent anesthetic) and remifentanil (a very potent opioid with rapid
onset and rapid offset). This study in essence tells me that when anesthesiologists
pay careful attention to details, unfavorable outcomes and severe adverse events
can be avoided. The presence of an intravenous line before induction also probably
provided an additional measure of safety.
Invasive Monitoring
Arterial and central venous catheters should be used in pediatric
patients whenever such monitors contribute to the management of safe anesthesia.
The anesthesiologist should not alter the decision to place these monitors simply
because the patient is small or because the anesthesiologist is uncomfortable applying
the technique to a pediatric patient. A variety of manufactured kits are available,
most of which use a thin-walled needle and a guidewire for venous access. If these
monitors are indicated, the anesthesiologist, surgeon, cardiologist, or neonatologist
should insert them. It is critical to pay special attention to the volume of fluid
and heparin infused; special care must be taken to avoid the introduction of air
bubbles. Pulmonary artery flow-directed catheters are rarely indicated in pediatric
patients because right- and left-sided cardiac pressures are almost identical. However,
occasionally, the occurrence of pulmonary artery hypertension or severe multisystem
failure may require the use of this monitor.
Multilumen catheters are very valuable in the care of critically
ill patients. These devices facilitate the simultaneous intravenous administration
of a variety of fluids, vasopressors, and antibiotics. However, these catheters
can also lead to a false sense of security created by having three intravenous ports.
Specifically, if rapid infusion of colloid or even crystalloid were necessary, the
long, narrow lumen would severely limit the rate of infusion and might prevent adequate
rapid volume replacement.[308]
[309]
If the need for rapid volume expansion might possibly arise, a separate large-bore
intravenous catheter should be inserted. Short-term cannulation of the femoral or
brachiocephalic vein is reasonable and may be lifesaving.