|
Volatile anesthetics are potent bronchodilators. In a retrospective study, Schnider and Papper[2] demonstrated halothane was superior to ether, cyclopropane, and ethylene in decreasing wheezing in 49 patients with symptoms of bronchospasm before anesthesia. Colgan[18] observed an increase in "bronchial distensibility" in dogs anesthetized with halothane, ether, or methoxyflurane. Halothane had the most pronounced effect. Increasing concentrations of halothane also caused a dose-dependent decrease in resting airway resistance in spontaneously breathing dogs.[19] Nevertheless, bronchodilation resulting from hypercarbia associated with deeper planes of anesthesia may have affected the results of these studies. Halothane and diethyl ether caused relaxation of resting tone in isolated guinea pig tracheal strips. [20] These anesthetics also attenuated tracheal muscle constriction produced by acetylcholine, but only halothane accomplished this in clinically relevant doses.
Hickey and colleagues[21] demonstrated the importance of controlled levels of arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO2 ) during the evaluation of the effects of drugs on bronchial smooth muscle tone. Halothane and cyclopropane did not alter the resistance of the resting, unstimulated airway in anesthetized, mechanically ventilated, normocapnic dogs. However, 1.5 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of halothane produced significant bronchodilation compared with cyclopropane during histamine- or vagal stimulation-induced bronchoconstriction. Halothane and, to a lesser degree, enflurane and methoxyflurane reversed hypocapnia-induced bronchoconstriction in the isolated canine left lower lobe.[22] Halothane also attenuated the bronchoconstricting effects of hypocarbia without affecting the resistive work of breathing (described more fully in "Ventilatory Mechanics") in the unstimulated state in humans under-going cardiopulmonary bypass.[23] Hypercapnia-induced bronchodilation and hypocapnia-induced bronchoconstriction were shown to be attenuated by isoflurane.[24]
A bronchospasm model developed by Hirshman and Bergman[25] using dogs sensitized to aerosolized Ascaris antigen has greatly contributed to our understanding of the effect of anesthetics on airway smooth muscle. Halothane and enflurane (1 MAC) similarly attenuate antigen-induced bronchospasm. Unlike an asthmatic attack during anesthesia, the stimulus to incite bronchospasm in this model is not maintained during experimentation. Isoflurane and halothane (1.5 MAC) produced a similar reduction in airway resistance in this canine model.[26] Similar results were obtained with volatile agents during methacholine-induced airway constriction. Taken together, these data suggest that isoflurane and halothane produce direct bronchodilation and depress airway reflexes. Although isoflurane appears to share significant bronchodilating properties with halothane and enflurane, halothane increased dynamic
Ascaris antigen-induced asthma was associated with increased plasma histamine levels that were not prevented by administration of halothane.[30] Halothane and topical atropine decreased bronchoconstriction during histamine-induced bronchospasm, but these effects were not additive or synergistic.[31]
Using computed tomography (CT), Brown and colleagues[32] showed that halothane causes greater bronchodilation than does isoflurane at low concentrations ( Fig. 6-1 ). Halothane also had a more pronounced relaxing
Figure 6-1
High-resolution computed tomography scans from one dog:
control (upper left), during 0.5% halothane (upper
right), during 1.0% halothane (lower left),
and during 1.5% halothane (lower right). Notice
the progressive dilation of the airways as indicated by the arrow.
(Adapted from Brown RH, Mitzner W, Zerhouni E, et al: Direct in vivo visualization
of bronchodilation induced by inhalational anesthesia using high-resolution computed
tomography. Anesthesiology 78:295, 1993.)
Administration of 1 or 2 MAC of halothane, enflurane, sevoflurane, and isoflurane did not alter baseline pulmonary resistance and dynamic pulmonary compliance. However, these agents significantly attenuated increases in pulmonary resistance and decreases in dynamic pulmonary compliance in response to intravenous histamine. Halothane was most effective in altering indices of bronchodilation, whereas responses to isoflurane, enflurane, and sevoflurane were nearly identical. [35] In contrast, halothane, enflurane, and sevoflurane were found to be equivalent at dilating third- or fourth-generation bronchi as measured directly with a fiberoptic bronchoscope in vivo.[40]
|