RIGHT VENTRICULAR EJECTION FRACTION PULMONARY ARTERY
CATHETERS
Although cardiovascular monitoring has focused predominantly on
left ventricular performance, in some instances, right ventricular dysfunction may
be the more important factor limiting the circulation.[687]
[688]
[689]
[690]
Patient populations at increased risk for right ventricular dysfunction include
those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, adult respiratory distress syndrome,
pulmonary hypertension, and right ventricular ischemia and infarction.[691]
Standard techniques are available for monitoring right ventricular
performance in patients with acute myocardial infarction involving the right ventricle.
ECG monitoring
using the V4
R lead has proved to be a sensitive and specific indicator
of right ventricular ischemia and infarction.[692]
[693]
[694]
PAC
monitoring in patients with right ventricular infarction often reveals the characteristic
hemodynamic patterns described earlier.[489]
[490]
[691]
[695]
However,
accurate evaluation of right ventricular performance in patients with other causes
of right ventricular dysfunction has proved more complicated. In patients with severe
respiratory failure, the confounding effects of mechanical ventilation with high
levels of PEEP have made interpretation of cardiac filling pressures difficult and,
in some cases, misleading.[675]
[696]
[697]
[698]
[699]
In intraoperative and critical care environments, measurement
of the right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) with a specially designed PAC offers
another method for evaluating right ventricular function. This method uses a standard
PAC equipped with a rapid-response thermistor that detects and quantifies the small
changes in pulmonary artery blood temperature that occur with each heartbeat.[700]
[701]
The thermistor measures these temperature
changes after bolus administration of an iced or room-temperature injectate, and
the cardiac output computer measures the residual fraction of thermal signal after
each heartbeat to determine the RVEF as 1 minus this average residual fraction.[701]
Clearly, all factors that confound standard thermodilution cardiac output measurement
will also interfere with accurate determination of RVEF. In addition, because the
temperature changes measured by the RVEF PAC are small, beat-to-beat changes, the
method will not work if the ECG R waves cannot be detected accurately, the R-R interval
is short as a result of tachycardia, or the cardiac rhythm is irregular.[675]
Comparison of PAC-based RVEF measurements with angiographic or nuclear techniques
has yielded mixed results in terms of accuracy, but this may reflect, in part, the
absence of a widely accepted reference standard for this measurement.[701]
[702]
[703]
Intraoperative use of the RVEF PAC has focused primarily on detection
of right ventricular dysfunction in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing
surgical revascularization. Reduced RVEF has been noted after cardiopulmonary bypass,
particularly in patients with preexisting right coronary artery obstruction.[704]
[705]
[706]
Anecdotally,
an acute reduction in RVEF from its normal value of approximately 40% may provide
an early sign of right ventricular ischemia.[707]
However, RVEF is an extremely load-dependent measurement of right ventricular performance,
and the clinician must keep this fact in mind to interpret this measurement properly.
[675]
[697]
[698]
Clinical use of the RVEF PAC appears to have found its greatest
application to date in critically ill patients, especially those with respiratory
failure.[675]
[697]
[698]
[699]
[708]
In these applications, the measurement of greatest interest has been right ventricular
end-diastolic volume, which is derived mathematically from RVEF.

where RVEDV = right ventricular end-diastolic volume
SV = stroke volume
RVEF = right ventricular ejection fraction
Right ventricular end-diastolic volume appears to correlate better
with cardiac output than do standard preload measurements such as CVP or PAWP.[675]
[698]
[699]
These
findings are not surprising given all the interpretive problems associated with monitoring
of cardiac filling pressure previously discussed. Furthermore, the better correlation
between right ventricular end-diastolic volume and cardiac output may result from
the mathematical coupling of measurements because both are derivatives of stroke
volume determined with the PAC. As in the case of standard PAC monitoring, however,
the benefit of RVEF PAC monitoring in terms of patient outcome remains unproven.
[559]