Considerations Regarding Children
It is generally assumed that the brain of an infant or child is
more resistant to injury leading to death, although
this issue is controversial and lacks convincing clinical documentation[86]
[87]
(see Chapter
51
, Chapter 60
,
and Chapter 76
). However,
on neurologic examination, infants and young children may recover substantial brain
functioning after periods of unresponsiveness that are longer than those from which
adults could recover.[8]
The presence of open fontanelles
and open sutures in young children makes the skull an expandable chamber. Intracranial
pressure does not exceed mean arterial blood pressure, and cerebral blood flow continues.
The need for facilitation of end-of-life decision and organ procurement
in infants and children has increased. In 1987, the Task Force for the Determination
of Brain Death in Children endorsed the Determination of Death Act and offered the
Guidelines for the Determination of Brain Death in Children[88]
( Table 79-2
). The distinctions
from the criteria for adults are three separate, longer observation periods, depending
on the child's age, and the necessity for two corroborating EEGs or one EEG with
corroborating radionuclide angiography. It is generally agreed that, except in very
immature, preterm newborns, the same criteria of brain death can apply to term newborns,
TABLE 79-2 -- Brain death guidelines for children
A. History: Determine the cause of coma to eliminate remediable
or reversible conditions |
B. Physical examination criteria |
1. Coma and apnea |
2. Absence of brainstem function |
a. Midposition or fully dilated
pupils |
b. Absence of spontaneous
oculocephalic ("doll's-eye") and caloric-induced eye movements |
c. Absence of movement of
bulbar musculature and corneal, gag, cough, sucking, and rooting reflexes |
d. Absence of respiratory
effort with standardized testing for apnea |
3. Patient must not be hypothermic or hypotensive. |
4. Flaccid tone and absence of spontaneous
or induced movements excluding activity mediated at spinal cord level |
5. Examination should remain consistent for
brain death throughout the predetermined period of observation. |
C. Observation period according to age |
1. Seven days to 2 months: two examinations
and electroencephalograms (EEGs) 48 hours apart |
2. Two months to 1 year: two examinations
and EEGs 24 hours apart and/or one examination and an initial EEG showing electrocerebral
silence combined with a radionuclide angiogram showing no cerebral blood flow |
3. Over 1 year: two examinations 12 to 24
hours apart. EEG and isotope angiography are optional. |
Data from Task Force for the Determination of Brain Death
in Children: Guidelines for the determination of brain death in children. Neurology
37:1077, 1987, and from Ashwal S: Brain death in early infancy. J Heart Lung Transplant
12(Pt 2): S176, 1993. |
infants older than 7 days, children, and adults[89]
if an observation period is prolonged for smaller children, although there have been
several reports arguing against this notion. Ashwal[90]
[91]
stressed that brain death could be diagnosed
in the term newborn, even when younger than 7 days old, if the observation period
to confirm the diagnosis was prolonged to 48 hours, and if the EEG was isoelectric
or a cerebral blood flow study showed no flow, the observation period could be shortened
to 24 hours. However, the Special Task Force excluded infants younger than 7 days
from its guideline.[88]
There are several concerns
about the diagnosis of brain death in newborns:
- If the injury occurred in utero, the duration of the insult and severity
may be difficult to establish.
- Normal systemic arterial pressure of newborn is not determined.
- The EEG and transcranial Doppler (TCD) sonography may not be 100% reliable.
- The clinical examinations cannot be reliable because of immaturity.[92]
It was reported that a premature infant sustained an intraventricular
hemorrhage on day 2 of life and showed the absence of brainstem reflexes, apnea,
and flaccidity but was never clinically brain dead,[93]
and that 15 of 20 neonates who had isoelectric EEGs preserved partial clinical brain
function.[94]
Mejia and colleagues[95]
investigated variability in the practices of determining brain death and organ procurement
in pediatric intensive care units. Contrary to their expectations, there was much
variability. Although apnea testing has been considered the most important criterion
for brain death,[96]
apnea testing was not carried
out for 23 (25%) of 93 brain-dead patients, and the methods of apnea testing were
not consistent with the Guideline for Determination of Brain Death in Children for
20 patients (22%). Four of 30 patients younger than 1 year did not have a confirmatory
test. They concluded that the variability in brain death determination practices
might reflect differences in documentation, lack of knowledge of the guidelines,
or disagreement with the guidelines.
|