|
Since its first successful application in 1983, lung transplantation has emerged as a relevant, effective therapy for end-stage lung disease. The combination of modern immunosuppressive therapy and continuing advances in surgical, anesthetic, and intensive care management has led to its current status as a realistic option for many patients with crippling or life-threatening pulmonary conditions. Both increased survival and dramatic improvement in quality of life are routinely achieved by those who undergo this procedure.[285] [366] [367] [368] [369] Nonetheless, lung transplantation continues to lag behind most other solid organ transplantation procedures in terms of both early and late patient survival ( Table 56-5 ), as well as organ availability. Perioperative complications such as infection and primary graft failure are largely responsible for an early (30 day) mortality rate of about 10%.[285] [366] [367] [370] The principal obstacles to long-term survival are posed by infection and especially by bronchiolitis obliterans, the pulmonary expression of chronic rejection.[285]
Lung transplantation for adults, as currently practiced, generally
refers to one of three different operations: heart-lung transplantation (HLT), single-lung
transplantation (SLT),
|
Survival | |
---|---|---|
Operation | Half-Life * (yr) | Conditional Half-Life † (yr) |
Double lung | 4.9 | 7.9 |
Single lung | 3.7 | 5.9 |
All lungs | 4.1 | 6.5 |
Heart-lung | 2.8 | 8.2 |
Candidates for BSLT and SLT procedures are selected on the basis of pulmonary disease sufficiently advanced that survival beyond 2 years is unlikely despite optimal medical management. In patients who present for isolated lung transplantation, the most frequent underlying conditions are chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), CF, α1 -antitrypsin deficiency, and PPH. A variety of less common pulmonary diagnoses, including sarcoidosis and retransplantation, as well as congenital heart diseases (i.e., those with Eisenmenger's syndrome), are found less frequently.[285]
Certain guidelines are generally followed, with occasional exceptions, in the selection of suitable lung transplant recipients ( Table 56-6 ). In this way, the probability is optimized that transplantation will enhance, not limit patient survival while at the same time ensure that donor organs are used with the greatest possible benefit.
In some situations, including previous malignancy,[368] current ventilator dependence, high-dose corticosteroid use,[373] previous thoracic procedures (especially those involving pleurodesis or patients with extensive
Recipient Selection Guidelines | Recipient Selection Contraindications |
---|---|
Clinically and physiologically severe disease | Acutely ill or unstable clinical status |
Medical therapy ineffective or unavailable | Uncontrolled or untreatable pulmonary or extrapulmonary infection |
Limited life expectancy, usually less than 2 to 3 yr | Uncured neoplasm |
Ambulatory with rehabilitation potential | Significant dysfunction of other vital organs, especially the liver, kidney, and central nervous system |
Acceptable nutritional status, usually 80% to 120% of ideal body weight | Significant coronary disease or left ventricular dysfunction |
Satisfactory psychosocial profile and support system | Active cigarette smoking |
Adequate coverage for the procedure and for post-transplantation care | Drug or alcohol dependency |
Age younger than 65 yr | Unresolvable psychosocial problems or noncompliance with medical management |
Once the patient is found to be a candidate, the decision of which specific transplantation procedure to perform (SLT, BSLT, or HLT) is frequently made on the basis of institutional or surgeon preference. The decision is guided by the underlying pulmonary and cardiac pathology, the degree of coexisting pulmonary hypertension, and the presence and nature of any comorbid conditions harbored by the recipient. These preferences are continually revised as worldwide experience evolves, and the available data may lead to contrasting practice patterns at different transplant centers. Certain generalizations can be made, however. Lung pathology with significant bacterial colonization as exemplified by CF and generalized bronchiectasis is usually managed with bilateral lung transplantation to prevent cross-contamination between the native lung and its adjacent allograft.[367] [368] [374] Children or young adults with CF are the most common recipients of the relatively uncommon living related bilateral lobar lung transplantation procedure. Patients with COPD (including the subset with α1 -antitrypsin deficiency) may undergo either bilateral or single-lung transplantation, usually the latter, yet recent data suggest a possible survival benefit with BSLT.[285] Unilateral transplantation is generally favored in patients with IPF because the retained native lung's decreased compliance and increased PVR favor the distribution of both ventilation (V̇) and flow () toward the allograft.[368] PPH patients would be expected to have significant V̇/ mismatching after SLT procedures because of high PVR and normal compliance in the native lung. The lack of evidence makes it unclear whether SLT or BSLT affords better survival. HLT, which had been the standard of care for PPH patients, is currently performed less often[368] ; severe RV dysfunction resulting from pulmonary hypertension is now recognized to improve after lung transplantation[374] and thus less frequently prompts HLT as opposed to isolated lung transplantation techniques.
|