Previous Next

LUNG TRANSPLANTATION (also see Chapter 49 )

Since its first successful application in 1983, lung transplantation has emerged as a relevant, effective therapy for end-stage lung disease. The combination of modern immunosuppressive therapy and continuing advances in surgical, anesthetic, and intensive care management has led to its current status as a realistic option for many patients with crippling or life-threatening pulmonary conditions. Both increased survival and dramatic improvement in quality of life are routinely achieved by those who undergo this procedure.[285] [366] [367] [368] [369] Nonetheless, lung transplantation continues to lag behind most other solid organ transplantation procedures in terms of both early and late patient survival ( Table 56-5 ), as well as organ availability. Perioperative complications such as infection and primary graft failure are largely responsible for an early (30 day) mortality rate of about 10%.[285] [366] [367] [370] The principal obstacles to long-term survival are posed by infection and especially by bronchiolitis obliterans, the pulmonary expression of chronic rejection.[285]

Organ Matching and Allocation

Lung transplantation for adults, as currently practiced, generally refers to one of three different operations: heart-lung transplantation (HLT), single-lung transplantation (SLT),
TABLE 56-5 -- Survival after lung transplant

Survival
Operation Half-Life * (yr) Conditional Half-Life (yr)
Double lung 4.9 7.9
Single lung 3.7 5.9
All lungs 4.1 6.5
Heart-lung 2.8 8.2
*Survival contingent on being alive 1 year after transplantation.
†Time at which 50% of patients are still living.





and bilateral sequential lung transplantation (BSLT). (For practical purposes, these terms universally connote whole-lung organs from cadaveric sources, although individual lobes may be retrieved from living donors, usually parents or other relatives of the recipient, for cases of bilateral lobar transplantation.[
371] ) Patients with primary lung pathology typically undergo isolated lung transplantation (i.e., SLT or BSLT), even in cases of associated secondary RV enlargement or dysfunction. If significant comorbid LV dysfunction is present, as may be caused by CAD, patients may instead undergo HLT. Even though patients with Eisenmenger's syndrome would historically have undergone HLT, it is now recognized that many patients may benefit from isolated lung transplantation provided that the cardiac defect can be surgically repaired.[372] In this way, the patient is not exposed to the risk of transplant-associated CAD (see discussion in the section "Anesthesia for Patients after Heart Transplantation"), and the use of scarce donor organs is maximized. Nonetheless, patients with Eisenmenger's syndrome, including those with potentially correctable cardiac defects, currently account for most patients who undergo the relatively uncommon HLT procedure. Other typical indications include primary pulmonary hypertension (PPH) and CF, each accounting for roughly 20% of HLT operations performed annually.[285] [372]

Candidates for BSLT and SLT procedures are selected on the basis of pulmonary disease sufficiently advanced that survival beyond 2 years is unlikely despite optimal medical management. In patients who present for isolated lung transplantation, the most frequent underlying conditions are chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), CF, α1 -antitrypsin deficiency, and PPH. A variety of less common pulmonary diagnoses, including sarcoidosis and retransplantation, as well as congenital heart diseases (i.e., those with Eisenmenger's syndrome), are found less frequently.[285]

Certain guidelines are generally followed, with occasional exceptions, in the selection of suitable lung transplant recipients ( Table 56-6 ). In this way, the probability is optimized that transplantation will enhance, not limit patient survival while at the same time ensure that donor organs are used with the greatest possible benefit.

In some situations, including previous malignancy,[368] current ventilator dependence, high-dose corticosteroid use,[373] previous thoracic procedures (especially those involving pleurodesis or patients with extensive


2264

TABLE 56-6 -- Recipient selection criteria for lung transplantation
Recipient Selection Guidelines Recipient Selection Contraindications
Clinically and physiologically severe disease Acutely ill or unstable clinical status
Medical therapy ineffective or unavailable Uncontrolled or untreatable pulmonary or extrapulmonary infection
Limited life expectancy, usually less than 2 to 3 yr Uncured neoplasm
Ambulatory with rehabilitation potential Significant dysfunction of other vital organs, especially the liver, kidney, and central nervous system
Acceptable nutritional status, usually 80% to 120% of ideal body weight Significant coronary disease or left ventricular dysfunction
Satisfactory psychosocial profile and support system Active cigarette smoking
Adequate coverage for the procedure and for post-transplantation care Drug or alcohol dependency
Age younger than 65 yr Unresolvable psychosocial problems or noncompliance with medical management

adhesion formation), and colonization with certain multidrug-resistant bacteria (mostly a problem in CF or bronchiectasis patients), it is difficult to determine whether a patient is a valid candidate for transplantation. The degree of contraindication posed by each of these factors varies between transplantation centers.

Once the patient is found to be a candidate, the decision of which specific transplantation procedure to perform (SLT, BSLT, or HLT) is frequently made on the basis of institutional or surgeon preference. The decision is guided by the underlying pulmonary and cardiac pathology, the degree of coexisting pulmonary hypertension, and the presence and nature of any comorbid conditions harbored by the recipient. These preferences are continually revised as worldwide experience evolves, and the available data may lead to contrasting practice patterns at different transplant centers. Certain generalizations can be made, however. Lung pathology with significant bacterial colonization as exemplified by CF and generalized bronchiectasis is usually managed with bilateral lung transplantation to prevent cross-contamination between the native lung and its adjacent allograft.[367] [368] [374] Children or young adults with CF are the most common recipients of the relatively uncommon living related bilateral lobar lung transplantation procedure. Patients with COPD (including the subset with α1 -antitrypsin deficiency) may undergo either bilateral or single-lung transplantation, usually the latter, yet recent data suggest a possible survival benefit with BSLT.[285] Unilateral transplantation is generally favored in patients with IPF because the retained native lung's decreased compliance and increased PVR favor the distribution of both ventilation (V̇) and flow () toward the allograft.[368] PPH patients would be expected to have significant V̇/ mismatching after SLT procedures because of high PVR and normal compliance in the native lung. The lack of evidence makes it unclear whether SLT or BSLT affords better survival. HLT, which had been the standard of care for PPH patients, is currently performed less often[368] ; severe RV dysfunction resulting from pulmonary hypertension is now recognized to improve after lung transplantation[374] and thus less frequently prompts HLT as opposed to isolated lung transplantation techniques.

Previous Next