|
In principle, any superficially located peripheral motor nerve may be stimulated. In clinical anesthesia, the ulnar nerve is the most popular site; the median, the posterior tibial, common peroneal, and facial nerves are also sometimes used. For stimulation of the ulnar nerve, the electrodes are best applied at the volar side of the wrist ( Fig. 39-9 ). The distal electrode should be placed about 1 cm proximal to the point at which the proximal flexion crease of the wrist crosses the radial side of the tendon to the flexor carpi ulnaris muscle. The proximal electrode preferably should be placed 2 to 5 cm proximal to the
Figure 39-9
Evaluation of neuromuscular blockade by feeling the response
of the thumb to stimulation of the ulnar nerve. (Courtesy of Organon Ltd.,
Dublin, Ireland.)
Because different muscle groups have different sensitivities to neuromuscular blocking agents, results obtained for one muscle cannot be extrapolated automatically to other muscles. The diaphragm is among the most resistant of all muscles to both depolarizing[35] and nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking drugs.[36] In general, the diaphragm requires 1.4 to 2.0 times as much muscle relaxant as the adductor pollicis muscle for an identicald egree of blockade ( Fig. 39-10 ).[36] Also of clinical significance are the facts that onset time is normally shorter for the diaphragm than for the adductor pollicis muscle and that the diaphragm recovers from paralysis more quickly than do the peripheral muscles ( Fig. 39-11 ).[37] The other respiratory
Figure 39-10
Mean cumulative dose-response curve for pancuronium in
two muscles shows that the diaphragm requires approximately twice as much pancuronium
as does the adductor pollicis muscle for the same amount of neuromuscular blockade.
The depression in muscle response to the first stimulus in TOF nerve stimulation
(probit scale) was plotted against dose (log scale). Force of contraction of the
adductor pollicis was measured on a force-displacement transducer; response of the
diaphragm was measured electromyographically. (From Donati F, Antzaka C,
Bevan DR: Potency of pancuronium at the diaphragm and the adductor pollicis muscle
in humans. Anesthesiology 65:1, 1986.)
Figure 39-11
Evolution of twitch height (mean ± SD) of the
diaphragm (closed circles) and of the adductor pollicis
muscle (open circles) in 10 anesthetized patients
after administration of atracurium 0.6 mg/kg. (From Pansard J-L, Chauvin
M, Lebrault C, et al: Effect of an intubating dose of succinylcholine and atracurium
on the diaphragm and the adductor pollicis muscle in humans. Anesthesiology 67:326,
1987.)
The precise source of these differences is unknown. Possible causes may be differences in acetylcholine receptor density, acetylcholine release, acetylcholinesterase activity, fiber composition, innervation ratio (number of neuromuscular junctions), blood flow, and muscle temperature.
In assessing neuromuscular function, the use of a relatively sensitive muscle such as the adductor pollicis of the hand has both disadvantages and advantages. Obviously, during surgery it is a disadvantage that even total elimination of the response to single-twitch and TOF stimulation does not exclude the possibility of movement of the diaphragm, such as hiccupping and coughing. PTC stimulation, however, allows for evaluation of the very intense blockade necessary to ensure total paralysis of the diaphragm. On the positive side, the risk of overdosing the patient decreases if the response of a relatively sensitive muscle is used as a guide to the administration of muscle relaxants during surgery. Also, during recovery, when the adductor pollicis has recovered sufficiently, it can be assumed that no residual neuromuscular blockade exists in the diaphragm or in other resistant muscles.
|