 |
|
|
REFERENCES
1.
Viby-Mogensen J, Chraemmer-Jorgensen B, Ørding
H: Residual curarization in the recovery room. Anesthesiology 50:539, 1979.
2.
Baillard C, Gehan G, Reboul-Marty, et al: Residual
curarization in the recovery room after vecuronium. Br J Anaesth 84:394, 2000.
3.
Hayes AH, Mirakhur RK, Breslin DS, et al: Postoperative
residual block after intermediate-acting neuromuscular blocking drugs. Anaesthesia
56:312, 2001.
4.
Debaene B, Plaud B, Dilly M-P, et al: Residual
paralysis in the PACU after a single intubating dose of nondepolarizing muscle relaxant
with an intermediate duration of action. Anesthesiology 98:1042, 2003.
5.
Viby-Mogensen J: Postoperative residual curarization
and evidence-based anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 84:301, 2000.
6.
Eriksson LI: Evidence-based practice and neuromuscular
monitoring. It's time for routine quantitative assessment. Anesthesiology 98:1037,
2003.
7.
Iwasaki H, Igarashi M, Namiki A: A preliminary
evaluation of magnetic stimulation of the ulnar nerve for monitoring neuromuscular
transmission. Anaesthesia 49:814, 1994.
8.
Moerer O, Baller C, Hinz J et al: Neuromuscular
effects of rapacuronium on the diaphragm and skeletal muscles in anaesthetized patients
using cervical magnetic stimulation for stimulating the phrenic nerves. Eur J Anaesth
19:883, 2002.
9.
Brull SJ, Ehrenwerth J, Silverman DG: Stimulation
with submaximal current for train-of-four monitoring. Anesthesiology 72:629, 1990.
10.
Brull SJ, Ehrenwerth J, Connelly NR, et al: Assessment
of residual curarization using low-current stimulation. Can J Anaesth 38:164, 1991.
11.
Silverman DG, Brull SJ: Assessment of double-burst
monitoring at 10 mA above threshold current. Can J Anaesth 40:502, 1993.
12.
Helbo-Hansen HS, Bang U, Nielsen HK, et al: The
accuracy of train-of-four monitoring at varying stimulating currents. Anesthesiology
76:199, 1992.
13.
Curran MJ, Donati F, Bevan DR: Onset and recovery
of atracurium and suxamethonium-induced neuromuscular blockade with simultaneous
train-of-four and single twitch stimulation. Br J Anaesth 59:989, 1987.
14.
Ali HH, Utting JE, Gray C: Stimulus frequency
in the detection of neuromuscular blocks in humans. Br J Anaesth 42:967, 1970.
15.
Ali HH, Utting JE, Gray C: Quantitative assessment
of residual antidepolarizing block (part II). Br J Anaesth 43:478, 1971.
16.
Paton WDM, Waud DR: The margin of safety of neuromuscular
transmission. J Physiol 191:59, 1967.
17.
Brull SJ, Silverman DG: Tetanus-induced changes
in apparent recovery after bolus doses of atracurium or vecuronium. Anesthesiology
77:642, 1992.
18.
Saitoh Y, Masuda A, Toyooka H, et al: Effect of
tetanic stimulation on subsequent train-of-four responses at various levels of vecuronium-induced
neuromuscular block. Br J Anaesth 73:416, 1994.
19.
Dupuis JY, Martin R, Tessonnier JM, et al: Clinical
assessment of the muscular response to tetanic nerve stimulation. Can J Anaesth
37:397, 1990.
20.
Viby-Mogensen J, Howardy-Hansen P, Chraemmer-Jorgensen
B, et al: Post-tetanic count (PTC). A new method of evaluating an intense nondepolarizing
neuromuscular blockade. Anesthesiology 55:458, 1981.
21.
Bonsu AK, Viby-Mogensen J, Fernando PUE, et al:
Relationship of post-tetanic count and train-of-four response during intense neuromuscular
blockade caused by atracurium. Br J Anaesth 59:1089, 1987.
22.
Muchhal KK, Viby-Mogensen J, Fernando PUE, et al:
Evaluation of intense neuromuscular blockade caused by vecuronium using post-tetanic
count (PTC). Anesthesiology 66:846, 1987.
23.
Fernando PUE, Viby-Mogensen J, Bonsu AK, et al:
Relationship between post-tetanic count and response to carinal stimulation during
vecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 31:593, 1987.
24.
Schultz P, Ibsen D, Østergaard D, et al:
Onset and duration of action of rocuronium: from tracheal intubation, through intense
block to complete recovery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 45:612, 2001.
25.
El-Orbany MI, Joseph JN, Salem MR: The relationship
of posttetanic count and train-of-four responses during recovery from intense cisatracurium-induced
neuromuscular blockade. Anesth Analg 97:80, 2003.
26.
Werba A, Klezl M, Schramm W, et al: The level
of neuromuscular block needed to suppress diaphragmatic movement during tracheal
suction in patients with raised intracranial pressure: A study with vecuronium and
atracurium. Anaesthesia 48:301, 1993.
27.
Engbæk J, Østergaard D, Viby-Mogensen
J: Double burst stimulation (DBS). A new pattern of nerve stimulation to identify
residual curarization. Br J Anaesth 62:274, 1989.
28.
Viby-Mogensen J, Jensen NH, Engbæk J, et
al: Tactile and visual evaluation of the response to train-of-four nerve stimulation.
Anesthesiology 63:440, 1985.
29.
Drenck NE, Olsen NV, Ueda N, et al: Clinical assessment
of residual curarization. A comparison of train-of-four stimulation and double burst
stimulation. Anesthesiology 70:578, 1989.
30.
Ueda N, Muteki T, Tsuda H, et al: Is the diagnosis
of significant residual neuromuscular blockade improved by using double-burst nerve
stimulation? Eur J Anaesth 8:213, 1991.
31.
Saddler JM, Bevan JC, Donati F, et al: Comparison
of double-burst and train-of-four stimulation to assess neuromuscular blockade in
children. Anesthesiology 73:401, 1990.
32.
Gill SS, Donati F, Bevan DR: Clinical evaluation
of double-burst stimulation. Its relationship to train-of-four stimulation. Anaesthesia
45:543, 1990.
33.
Fruergaard K, Viby-Mogensen J, Berg H, et al:
Tactile evaluation of the response to double burst stimulation decreases, but does
not eliminate the problem of postoperative residual paralysis. Acta Anaesthesiol
Scand, 42:1168, 1998.
34.
Brull SJ, Silverman DG: Pulse width, stimulus
intensity, electrode placement, and polarity during assessment of neuromuscular block.
Anesthesiology 83:702, 1995.
35.
Smith CE, Donati F, Bevan DR: Potency of succinylcholine
at the diaphragm and the adductor pollicis muscle. Anesth Analg 67:625, 1988.
36.
Donati F, Antzaka C, Bevan DR: Potency of pancuronium
at the diaphragm and the adductor pollicis muscle in humans. Anesthesiology 65:1,
1986.
37.
Pansard J-L, Chauvin M, Lebrault C, et al: Effect
of an intubating dose of succinylcholine and atracurium on the diaphragm and the
adductor pollicis muscle in humans. Anesthesiology 67:326, 1987.
38.
Plaud B, Debaene B, Donati F: The corrugator supercilii,
not orbicularis oculi, reflects rocuronium neuromuscular blockade at the laryngeal
adductor muscles. Anesthesiology 95:96, 2001.
39.
Hemmerling TM, Donati F: Neuromuscular blockade
at the larynx, the diaphragm and the corrugator supercilii muscle: a review. Can
J Anesth 50:779, 2003.
40.
Donati F, Meistelman C, Plaud B: Vecuronium neuromuscular
blockade at the diaphragm, the orbicularis oculi, and adductor pollicis muscles.
Anesthesiology 73:870, 1990.
41.
Donati F, Meistelman C, Plaud B: Vecuronium neuromuscular
blockade at the adductor muscles of the larynx and adductor pollicis. Anesthesiology
74:833, 1991.
42.
Ungureanu D, Meistelman C, Frossard J, et al:
The orbicularis oculi and the adductor pollicis muscles as monitors of atracurium
block of laryngeal muscles. Anesth Analg 77:775, 1993.
43.
Rimaniol JM, Dhonneur G, Sperry L, et al: A comparison
of the neuromuscular blocking effects of atracurium, mivacurium, and vecuronium on
the adductor pollicis and the orbicularis oculi muscle in humans. Anesth Analg 83:808,
1996.
44.
Smith CE, Donati F, Bevan DR: Differential effects
of pancuronium on masseter and adductor pollicis muscles in humans. Anesthesiology
71:57, 1989.
45.
Isono S, Ide T, Kochi T, et al: Effects of partial
paralysis on the swallowing reflex in conscious humans. Anesthesiology 75:980, 1991.
46.
Pavlin EG, Holle R, Schone R: Recovery of airway
protection compared with ventilation in humans after paralysis with curare. Anesthesiology
70:381, 1989.
47.
D'Honneur G, Guignard B, Slavov V, et al: Comparison
of the neuromuscular blocking effect of atracurium and vecuronium on the adductor
pollicis and the geniohyoid muscle in humans. Anesthesiology 82:649, 1995.
48.
Eriksson LI, Sundman E, Olsson R, et al: Functional
assessment of the pharynx at rest and during swallowing in partially paralyzed humans.
Anesthesiology 87:1035, 1997.
49.
Sopher MJ, Sears DH, Walts LF: Neuromuscular function
monitoring comparing the flexor hallucis brevis and adductor pollicis muscles. Anesthesiology
69:129, 1988.
50.
Suzuki T, Suzuki H, Katsumata N, et al: Evaluation
of twitch responses obtained from abductor hallucis muscle as a monitor of neuromuscular
blockade: Comparison with the results from adductor pollicis muscle. J Anesth 8:44,
1994.
51.
Kern SE, Johnson JO, Orr JA, et al: Clinical analysis
of the flexor hallucis brevis as an alternative site for monitoring neuromuscular
block from mivacurium. J Clin Anesth 9:383, 1997.
52.
Saitoh Y, Fujii Y, Takahashi K, et al: Recovery
of post-tetanic count and train-of-four responses at the great toe and thumb. Anaesthesia
53:244, 1998.
53.
Viby-Mogensen J, Engbæk J, Gramstad L, et
al: Good Clinical Research Practice (GCRP) in pharmacodynamic studies of neuromuscular
blocking agents. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 40:59, 1996.
54.
Lee GC, Iyengar S, Szenohradszky J, et al: Improving
the design of muscle relaxant studies. Anesthesiology 86:48, 1997.
55.
Hemmerling TM, Schmidt J, Hanusa C, et al: Simultaneous
determination of neuromuscular block at the larynx, diaphragm, adductor pollicis,
orbicularis oculi and corrugator supercilii muscles. Br J Anaesth 856:860, 2000.
56.
Hemmerling TM, Schurr C, Walter S, et al: A new
method of monitoring the effect of muscle relaxants on laryngeal muscle using surface
laryngeal electromyography. Anesth Analg 90:494, 2000.
57.
Hemmerling TM, Schmidt J, Wolf T, et al: Intramuscular
versus surface electromyography of the diaphragm for determining neuromuscular blockade.
Anesth Analg 92:106, 2001.
58.
Hemmerling TM, Schmidt J, Hanusa C, et al: The
lumbar paravertebral region provides a novel site to assess neuromuscular block at
the diaphragm. Can J Anesth 48:356, 2001.
59.
Viby-Mogensen J: Neuromuscular monitoring. Curr
Opin Anaesthesiol 14:655, 2001.
60.
Engbæk J, Skovgaard LT, Fries B, et al:
Monitoring of neuromuscular transmission by electromyography (II). Evoked compound
EMG area, amplitude and duration compared to mechanical twitch recording during onset
and recovery of pancuronium-induced blockade in the cat. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand
37:788, 1993.
61.
Kopman AF: The relationship of evoked electromyographic
and mechanical responses following atracurium in humans. Anesthesiology 63:208,
1985.
62.
Engbæk J, Østergaard D, Viby-Mogensen
J: Clinical recovery and train-of-four ratio measured mechanically and electromyographically
following atracurium. Anesthesiology 71:391, 1989.
63.
Kosek PS, Sears DHJ, Rubinstein EH: Minimizing
movement-induced changes in twitch response during integrated electromyography [letter].
Anesthesiology 69:142, 1988.
64.
Viby-Mogensen J, Jensen E, Werner M, et al: Measurement
of acceleration: A new method of monitoring neuromuscular function. Acta Anaesthesiol
Scand 32:45, 1988.
65.
Jensen E, Viby-Mogensen J, Bang U: The Accelograph:
A new neuromuscular transmission monitor. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 32:49, 1988.
66.
Viby-Mogensen J: Monitoring neuromuscular function
in the Intensive Care Unit. Intensive Care Med 19:S74, 1993.
67.
Hodges UM: Vecuronium infusion requirements in
paediatric patients in intensive care units: The use of acceleromyography. Br J
Anaesth 76:23, 1996.
68.
Werner MU, Kirkegaard Nielsen H, et al: Assessment
of neuromuscular transmission by the evoked acceleration response. An evaluation
of the accuracy of the acceleration transducer in comparison with a force displacement
transducer. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 32:395, 1988.
69.
Ansermino JM, Sanderson PM, Bevan DR: Acceleromyography
improves detection of residual neuromuscular blockade in children. Can J Anaesth
43:589, 1996.
70.
May O, Kirkegaard Nielsen H, Werner MU: The acceleration
transducer—an assessment of its precision in comparison with a force displacement
transducer. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 32:239, 1988.
71.
Harper NJN, Martlew R, Strang T, et al: Monitoring
neuromuscular block by acceleromyography: Comparison of the Mini-Accelograph with
the Myograph 2000. Br J Anaesth 72:411, 1994.
72.
McCluskey A, Meakin G, Hopkinson JM, et al: A
comparison of acceleromyography and mechanomyography for determination of the dose-response
curve of rocuronium in children. Anaesthesia 52:345, 1997.
73.
Kirkegaard-Nielsen H, Helbo-Hansen HS, Pedersen
SH, et al: New equipment for neuromuscular transmission monitoring: A comparison
of the TOF-Guard with the Myograph 2000. J Clin Monitor Comput 14:19, 1998.
74.
Kopman AF, Klewicka MM, Neuman GG: The relationship
between acceleromyographic train-of-four fade and single twitch depression. Anesthesiology
96:583, 2002.
75.
Kopman AF: Measurement and monitoring of neuromuscular
blockade. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 15:415, 2002.
76.
Eikermann M, Groeben H, Hüsing J, et al:
Accelerometry of adductor pollicis muscle predicts recovery of respiratory function
from neuromuscular blockade. Anesthesiology 98:1133, 2003.
77.
Mortensen CR, Berg H, El-Mahdy A, et al: Perioperative
monitoring of neuromuscular transmission using acceleromyography prevents residual
neuromuscular block following pancuronium. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 39:797, 1995.
78.
Gätke MR, Viby-Mogensen J, Rosenstock C, et
al: Postoperative muscle paralysis after rocuronium: Less residual block when acceleromyography
is used. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 46:207, 2002.
79.
Gätke MR, Larsen PB, Engbæk J, et al:
Acceleromyography of the orbicularis oculi muscle I: significance of the electrode
position. Acta Anesthesiol Scand 46:1124, 2002.
80.
Larsen PB, Gätke MR, Fredensborg BB, et al:
Acceleromyography of the orbicularis oculi muscle. II: Comparing the orbicularis
oculi and adductor pollicis muscles. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 46:1131, 2002.
81.
Kern SE, Johnson JO, Westenkow DR, et al: An effectiveness
study of a new piezoelectric sensor for train-of-four measurement. Anesth Analg
78:978, 1994.
82.
Pelgrims K, Vanacker B: Comparative study of the
TOF-ratio measured by the ParaGraph versus the TOF-Guard, with and without thumb
repositioning. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg 52:297, 2001.
83.
Dahaba AA, von Klobucar F, Rehak PH, et al: The
neuromuscular transmission module versus the relaxometer mechanomyograph for neuromuscular
block monitoring. Anesth Analg 94:591, 2002.
84.
Barry DT: Muscle sounds from evoked twitches in
the hand. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 72:573, 1991.
85.
Dascalu A, Geller E, Moalem Y, et al: Acoustic
monitoring of intraoperative neuromuscular block. Br J Anaesth 83:405, 1999.
86.
Hemmerling TM, Donati F, Beaulieu P, et al: Phonomyography
of the corrugator supercilii muscle: Signal characteristics, best recording site
and comparison with acceleromyography. Br J Anaesth 88:389, 2002.
87.
Hemmerling TM, Donati F, Babin D, et al: Duration
of control stimulation does not affect onset and offset of neuromuscular blockade
at the corrugator supercilii muscle measured with phonomyography or acceleromyography.
Can J Anesth 49:913, 2002.
88.
Hemmerling TM, Babin D, Donati F: Phonomyography
as a novel method to determine neuromuscular blockade at the laryngeal adductor muscles.
Anesthesiology 98:359, 2003.
89.
Hemmerling TM, Michaud G, Trager G, et al: Phonomyography
and mechanomyography can be used interchangeably to measure neuromuscular block at
the adductor pollicis muscle. Anesth Analg 98:377, 2004.
90.
Gibson FM, Mirakhur RK, Clarke RSJ, et al: Quantification
of train-of-four responses during recovery of block from non-depolarizing muscle
relaxants. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 31:655, 1987.
91.
O'Hara DA, Fragen RJ, Shanks CA: Comparison of
visual and measured train-of-four recovery after vecuronium-induced neuromuscular
blockade using two anaesthetic techniques. Br J Anaesth 58:1300, 1986.
92.
Engbæk J, Østergaard D, Theil Skovgaard
L, et al: Reversal of intense neuromuscular blockade following infusion of atracurium.
Anesthesiology 72:803, 1990.
93.
Kopman AF, Yee PS, Neuman GG: Relationship of
the train-of-four fade ratio to clinical signs and symptoms of residual paralysis
in awake volunteers. Anesthesiology 86:765, 1997.
94.
Ali HH, Wilson RS, Savarese JJ, et al: The effect
of tubocurarine on indirectly elicited train-of-four muscle response and respiratory
measurements in humans. Br J Anaesth 47:570, 1975.
95.
Ali HH, Utting JE, Gray C: Quantitative assessment
of residual antidepolarizing block (part I). Br J Anaesth 43:473, 1971.
96.
Brand JB, Cullen DJ, Wilson NE, et al: Spontaneous
recovery from non-depolarizing neuromuscular blockade: Correlation between clinical
and evoked responses. Anesth Analg 56:55, 1977.
97.
Eriksson LI, Lennmarken C, Wyon N, et al: Attenuated
ventilatory response to hypoxaemia at vecuronium-induced partial neuromuscular block.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 36:710, 1992.
98.
Eriksson LI, Sato M, Severinghaus JW: Effect of
a vecuronium-induced partial neuromuscular block on hypoxic ventilatory response.
Anesthesiology 78:693, 1993.
99.
Berg H, Viby-Mogensen J, Roed J, et al: Residual
neuromuscular block is a risk factor for postoperative pulmonary complications.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 41:1095, 1997.
100.
Wyon N, Joensen H, Yamamoto Y, et al: Carotid
body chemoreceptor function is impaired by vecuronium during hypoxia. Anesthesiology
89:1471, 1999.
101.
Sundman E, Witt H, Olsson R, et al: The incidence
and mechanism of pharyngeal and upper esophagus dysfunction in partially paralyzed
humans. Anesthesiology 92:997, 2000.
102.
Jonsson M, Kim C, Yamamoto Y, et al: Atracurium
and vecuronium block nicotine-induced carotid body responses. Acta Anaesthesiol
Scand 94:117, 2002.
103.
Shorten GD, Merk H: Perioperative train-of-four
monitoring and residual curarization. Can J Anaesth 42:711, 1995.
104.
Kopman AF, Ng J, Zank LM, et al: Residual postoperative
paralysis. Pancuronium versus mivacurium, does it matter? Anesthesiology 85:1253,
1996.
105.
Heier T, Caldwell JE, Sessler DI, et al: The
effect of local surface and central cooling on adductor pollicis twitch tension during
nitrous oxide/isoflurane and nitrous oxide/fentanyl anesthesia in humans. Anesthesiology
72:807, 1990.
106.
Eriksson LI, Lennmarken C, Jensen E, et al: Twitch
tension and train-of-four ratio during prolonged neuromuscular monitoring at different
peripheral temperatures. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 35:247, 1991.
107.
Thornberry EA, Mazumdar B: The effect of changes
in arm temperature on neuromuscular monitoring in the presence of atracurium blockade.
Anaesthesia 43:447, 1988.
108.
Kirkegaard H, Heier T, Caldwell JE: Efficacy
of tactile-guided reversal from cisatracurium-induced neuromuscular block. Anesthesiology
96:45, 2002.
109.
Kopman AF, Zank LM, Ng J, et al: Antagonism of
cisatracurium and rocuronium block at a tactile train-of-four count of 2: Should
quantitative assessment of neuromuscular function be mandatory? Anesth Analg 98:102,
2004.
110.
Pedersen T, Viby-Mogensen J, Bang U, et al: Does
perioperative tactile evaluation of the train-of-four response influence the frequency
of postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade? Anesthesiology 73:835, 1990.
