Previous Next

Post-Tetanic Count Stimulation

Injection of a nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking drug in a dose sufficient to ensure smooth tracheal intubation causes intense neuromuscular blockade of the peripheral muscles. Because no response to TOF and single-twitch stimulation occurs under these conditions, these modes of stimulation cannot be used to determine the degree of blockade. It is possible, however, to quantify intense neuromuscular blockade of the peripheral muscles by applying tetanic stimulation (50 Hz for 5 seconds) and observing the post-tetanic response to single-twitch


Figure 39-4 Pattern of electrical stimulation and evoked muscle responses to TOF nerve stimulation, 50-Hz tetanic nerve stimulation for 5 seconds (TE), and 1.0-Hz post-tetanic twitch stimulation (PTS) during four different levels of nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockade. During very intense blockade of the peripheral muscles (A), no response to any of the forms of stimulation occurs. During less pronounced blockade (B and C), there is still no response to stimulation, but post-tetanic facilitation of transmission is present. During surgical block (D), the first response to TOF appears and post-tetanic facilitation increases further. The post-tetanic count (see text) is 1 during intense block (B), 3 during less intense block (C), and 8 during surgical block (D).

stimulation given at 1 Hz starting 3 seconds after the end of tetanic stimulation. [20] During very intense blockade, there is no response to either tetanic or post-tetanic stimulation ( Fig. 39-4 ). However, when the very intense neuromuscular blockade dissipates and before the first response to TOF stimulation reappears, the first response to post-tetanic twitch stimulation occurs. As the intense block dissipates, more and more responses to post-tetanic twitch stimulation appear. For a given neuromuscular blocking drug, the time until return of the first response to TOF stimulation is related to the number of post-tetanic twitch responses present at a given time (the post-tetanic count)[20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] ( Fig. 39-5 ).

The main application of the PTC method is in evaluating the degree of neuromuscular blockade when there is no reaction to single twitch or TOF nerve stimulation, as may be the case after injection of a large dose of a nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking drug. However, PTC can also be used whenever sudden movements must be eliminated (e.g., during ophthalmic surgery). The necessary level of block of the adductor pollicis muscle to ensure paralysis of the diaphragm depends on the type of anesthesia and, in the intensive care unit, on the level of sedation.[23] [26] To ensure elimination of any bucking or coughing in response to tracheobronchial stimulation, neuromuscular blockade of the peripheral muscles must be so intense that no response to post-tetanic twitch stimulation can be elicited (PTC-0)[20] [21] [22] [24] [25] ( Fig. 39-6 ).

The response to PTC stimulation depends primarily on the degree of neuromuscular blockade. It also depends on the frequency and duration of tetanic stimulation, the length of time between the end of tetanic stimulation and the first post-tetanic stimulus, the frequency of the single-twitch stimulation, and also (probably) the length


1555


Figure 39-5 Relationship between the post-tetanic count (PTC) and time when onset of train-of-four (T1 ) is likely to be elicited for various neuromuscular blocking agents. (From El-Orbany MI, Joseph JN, Salem MR: The relationship of posttetanic count and train-of-four responses during recovery from intense cisatracurium-induced neuromuscular blockade. Anesth Analg 97:80, 2003.)

of single-twitch stimulation before tetanic stimulation. When the PTC method is used, these variables should therefore be kept constant. Also, because of possible antagonism of neuromuscular blockade in the hand, tetanic stimulation should not be given more often than every 6 minutes.[20] If the hand muscles undergo antagonism of neuromuscular blockade while the rest of the body is still paralyzed, the hand muscles are no longer useful for monitoring.

Previous Next