PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION
It is ironic that, as our interest, expertise, and knowledge concerning
preoperative evaluation (see Chapter
25
) is increasing, our ability to meet and talk with patients directly
appears to be decreasing. The emphasis on ambulatory surgery (see later; also see
Chapter 68
) and same-day
admissions, regardless of type of surgery, often makes preoperative personal contact
with patients, whether in urban or rural settings, difficult. Despite such challenges
(as well as those relating to staffing, patient scheduling, and payment), preoperative
clinics appear to be increasingly prevalent.[13]
They perform the functions of data acquisition, data screening (followed by physician
consultation in an unknown percentage of cases), and patient education. Patients
are seen, histories and physical examinations are reviewed, appropriate (and only
appropriate) laboratory tests are ordered, and additional consultations, if indicated,
are requested.[14]
[15]
Explanations of the anesthetic and surgical plans and of the options available for
postoperative pain relief decrease patients' anxiety and give them a modicum of control
over their own destiny.[15]
Evaluation of comorbid
conditions is not only directed toward "getting the patient ready for surgery" but
also—and more importantly—focuses on the long-term prognosis of specific
diseases and may enhance the patient's health status (e.g., initiate β-adrenergic
blocker therapy for those at risk for complications of coronary artery disease).
Diagnostic, therapeutic, and consultative
interventions are then ordered from that perspective. This is especially true in
the area of cardiac disease.[17]
[18]
A primary issue is the staffing of these preoperative clinics.
The use of advanced practice nurses appears to be common. A question that arises
is whether it is ideal, desirable, and, most importantly, necessary and economically
feasible for all patients to talk to an anesthesiologist during the preoperative
evaluation. Screening of patient data using various algorithms can determine those
whose medical status warrants direct physician consultation. Additionally, even
if a patient does talk with an anesthesiologist, it is increasingly likely that it
will not be the one who will be directly involved with his or her intraoperative
care. This makes review and discussion of the anesthetic plan with the patient on
the day of surgery, although occasionally time-consuming and inefficient, mandatory.
Undoubtedly, new options for familiarizing patients about anesthesia
and surgery will emerge in the ensuing years. These might, and in some cases already
do, include greater family involvement in anesthesia care, especially in the case
of pediatric patients, and supplemental videotapes, in-hospital on-demand television,
and departmental or hospital-based Web sites accessible from the patient's home.
[16]
These sites will likely become interactive
and a source for data input directly by the patient.