 |
|
|
REFERENCES
1.
Faden RR, Beauchamp TL: A History and Theory of
Informed Consent. New York, Oxford University Press, 1986.
2.
Salgo v Trustees of Leland Stanford Hospital, 154
Col App 2d 560,317 P2d 170 Ct Appl, 1957.
3.
Beauchamp TL: Informed consent. In
Veatch RM (ed): Medical Ethics, 2nd ed. Sudberry, MA, Jones & Bartlett, 1997,
pp 185–208.
4.
Cobbs v Grant, 104 Cal Rptr 505,502 P2d 1, 1972.
5.
Waisel DB, Truog RD: Informed consent. Anesthesiology
87:968–978, 1997.
6.
Shine v Vega, 429 Mass 456,709 NE2d 58, 1999.
7.
Annas GJ: The last resort—The use of physical
restraints in medical emergencies. N Engl J Med 341:1408–1412, 1999.
8.
Natanson v Kline, 186 Kan 393,409–410,350
P2d 1093, rehearing denied, Kan 186,354 P2d 670, 1960.
9.
Beauchamp TL, Childress JF: Principles of Biomedical
Ethics, 4th ed. New York, Oxford University Press, 1994.
10.
Litman RS, Berger AA, Chibber A: An evaluation
of preoperative anxiety in a population of parents of infants and children undergoing
ambulatory surgery. Paediatr Anaesth 6:443–447, 1996.
11.
Waisel DB, Truog RD: The benefits of the explanation
of the risks of anesthesia in the day surgery patient. J Clin Anesth 7:200–204,
1995.
12.
Ende J, Kazis L, Ash A, et al: Measuring patients'
desire for autonomy: Decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical
patients. J Gen Intern Med 4:23–30, 1989.
13.
Lonsdale M, Hutchison GL: Patients' desire for
information about anaesthesia. Scottish and Canadian attitudes. Anaesthesia 46:410–412,
1991.
14.
Jackson A, Henry R, Avery N, et al: Informed consent
for labour epidurals: What labouring women want to know. Can J Anaesth 47:1068–1073,
2000.
15.
Kain ZN, Kosarussavadi B, Hernandez-Conte A, et
al: Desire for perioperative information in adult patients: A cross-sectional study.
J Clin Anesth 9:467–472, 1997.
16.
Litman RS, Perkins FM, Dawson SC: Parental knowledge
and attitudes toward discussing the risk of death from anesthesia. Anesth Analg
77:256–260, 1993.
17.
Kain ZN, Wang SM, Caramico LA, et al: Parental
desire for perioperative information and informed consent: A two-phase study. Anesth
Analg 84:299–306, 1997.
18.
Benbassat J, Pilpel D, Tidhar M: Patients' preferences
for participation in clinical decision making: A review of published surveys. Behav
Med 24:81–88, 1998.
19.
Hirsh HL: A visitation with informed consent and
refusal. In Wecht CH (ed): Legal Medicine. Charlottesville,
VA, Michie, 1995, pp 147–204.
20.
Bianco EA, Hirsch HL: Consent to and refusal of
medical treatment. In Sanbar SS, Gibofsky A, Firestone
MH, et al (eds): Legal Medicine, 3rd ed. St. Louis, Mosby-Year Book, 1995, pp 274–296.
21.
Liang BA, Truog RD, Waisel DB: What needs to be
said? Informed consent in the context of spinal anesthesia. J Clin Anesth 8:525–527,
1996.
22.
Clark SK, Leighton BL, Seltzer JL: A risk-specific
anesthesia consent form may hinder the informed consent process. J Clin Anesth 3:11–13,
1991.
23.
Zvara DA, Mathes DD, Brooker RF, et al: Video
as a patient teaching tool: Does it add to the preoperative anesthetic visit? Anesth
Analg 82:1065–1068, 1996.
24.
Done ML, Lee A: The use of a video to convey preanesthetic
information to patients undergoing ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg 87:531–536,
1998.
25.
Canterbury v Spence, 464 F2d 772, 1972.
26.
Kain ZN, Wang SM, Caramico LA, et al: Parental
desire for perioperative information and informed consent a two-phase study. Anesth
Analg 84:299–306, 1997.
27.
Meisel A, Kuczewski M: Legal and ethical myths
about informed consent. Arch Intern Med 156:2521–2526, 1996.
28.
Byrne J, Napier A, Cuschieri A: How informed is
signed consent? BMJ 296:839–840, 1988.
29.
Neptune SM, Hopper KD, Houts PS, et al: Take-home
informed consent for intravenous contrast media: Do patients learn more? Invest
Radiol 31:109–113, 1996.
30.
Lloyd A, Hayes P, Bell PR, et al: The role of
risk and benefit perception in informed consent for surgery. Med Decis Making 21:141–149,
2001.
31.
Godwin Y: Do they listen? A review of information
retained by patients following consent for reduction mammoplasty. Br J Plast Surg
53:121–125, 2000.
32.
Hume MA, Kennedy B, Asbury AJ: Patient knowledge
of anaesthesia and peri-operative care. Anaesthesia 49:715–718, 1994.
33.
Priluck IA, Robertson DM, Buettner H: What patients
recall of the preoperative discussion after retinal detachment surgery. Am J Ophthalmol
87:620–623, 1979.
34.
Swan HD, Borshoff DC: Informed consent—Recall
of risk information following epidural analgesia in labour. Anaesth Intensive Care
22:139–141, 1994.
35.
Affleck PJ, Waisel DB, Cusick JM, et al: Recall
of risks following labor epidural analgesia. J Clin Anesth 10:141–144, 1998.
36.
Mayberry MK, Mayberry JF: Towards better informed
consent in endoscopy: A study of information and consent processes in gastroscopy
and flexible sigmoidoscopy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 13:1467–1476, 2001.
37.
Langdon IJ, Hardin R, Learmonth ID: Informed consent
for total hip arthroplasty: Does a written information sheet improve recall by patients?
Ann R Coll Surg Engl 84:404–408, 2002.
38.
Chan Y, Irish JC, Wood SJ, et al: Patient education
and informed consent in head and neck surgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 128:1269–1274,
2002.
39.
Turner P, Williams C: Informed consent: Patients
listen and read, but what information do they retain? N Z Med J 115:U218, 2002.
40.
Bellew M, Atkinson KR, Dixon G, et al: The introduction
of a paediatric anaesthesia information leaflet: An audit of its impact on parental
anxiety and satisfaction. Paediatr Anaesth 12:124–130, 2002.
41.
Garrud P, Wood M, Stainsby L: Impact of risk information
in a patient education leaflet. Patient Educ Couns 43:301–304, 2001.
42.
Mazur DJ, Hickam DH: Patients' preferences for
risk disclosure and role in decision making for invasive medical procedures. J Gen
Intern Med 12:114–117, 1997.
43.
Arora NK, McHorney CA: Patient preferences for
medical decision making: Who really wants to participate? Med Care 38:335–341,
2000.
44.
Davis MA, Hoffman JR, Hsu J: Impact of patient
acuity on preference for information and autonomy in decision making. Acad Emerg
Med 6:781–785, 1999.
45.
Stiggelbout AM, Kiebert GM: A role for the sick
role. Patient preferences regarding information and participation in clinical decision-making.
Can Med Assoc J 157:383–389, 1997.
46.
Street RL Jr, Voigt B, Geyer C Jr, et al: Increasing
patient involvement in choosing treatment for early breast cancer. Cancer 76:2275–2285,
1995.
47.
Mansell D, Poses RM, Kazis L, et al: Clinical
factors that influence patients' desire for participation in decisions about illness.
Arch Intern Med 160:2991–2996, 2000.
48.
Truman v Thomas, 27 Cal3d 285, 65 Cal Rptr 308,611
P2d 902, 1980.
49.
Dellinger AM, Vickery AM: When staff object to
participating in care. J Health Hosp Law 28:269–285, 1995.
50.
Annas GJ: Protecting patients from discrimination—The
Americans with Disabilities Act and HIV infection. N Engl J Med 339:1255–1259,
1998.
51.
Leviticus 17:13–14.
52.
Genesis 9:3–4.
53.
Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania:
How can blood save your life? Brooklyn, Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New
York, 1990.
54.
Weiskopf RB: More on the changing indications
for transfusion of blood and blood components during anesthesia. Anesthesiology
84:498–501, 1996.
55.
Practice guidelines for blood component therapy:
A report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Blood Component
Therapy. Anesthesiology 84:732–747, 1996.
56.
Benson KT: The Jehovah's Witness patient: Considerations
for the anesthesiologist. Anesth Analg 69:647–656, 1989.
57.
Rothenberg DM: The approach to the Jehovah's Witness
patient. Anesth Clin North Am 8:589–607, 1990.
58.
Gostin LO: National health information privacy:
Regulations under the health insurance portability and accountability act. JAMA
285:3015–3021, 2001.
59.
Geller G, Botkin JR, Green MJ, et al: Genetic
testing for susceptibility to adult-onset cancer. The process and content of informed
consent. JAMA 277:1467–1474, 1997.
60.
Lapham EV, Kozma C, Weiss JO: Genetic discrimination:
Perspectives of consumers. Science 274:621–624, 1996.
61.
Welch CA: Sacred secrets—The privacy of
medical records. N Engl J Med 345:371–372, 2001.
62.
Informed consent, parental permission, and assent
in pediatric practice. Committee on Bioethics, American Academy of Pediatrics.
Pediatrics 95:314–317, 1995.
63.
Reddy DM, Fleming R, Swain C: Effect of mandatory
parental notification on adolescent girls' use of sexual health care services. JAMA
288:710–714, 2002.
64.
Klein JD, Wilson KM, McNulty M, et al: Access
to medical care for adolescents: Results from the 1997 Commonwealth Fund Survey
of the Health of Adolescent Girls. J Adolesc Health 25:120–130, 1999.
65.
Ford CA, Bearman PS, Moody J: Foregone health
care among adolescents. JAMA 282:2227–2234, 1999.
66.
Ford CA, English A: Limiting confidentiality of
adolescent health services: What are the risks? JAMA 288:752–753, 2002.
67.
Guidelines on forgoing life-sustaining medical
treatment. Committee on Bioethics, American Academy of Pediatrics. Pediatrics 93:532–536,
1994.
68.
Anderson B, Hall B: Parents' perceptions of decision
making for children. J Law Med Ethics 23:15–19, 1995.
69.
Strong C: Respecting the health care decision-making
capacity of minors. Bioethics Forum 11:7–12, 1995.
70.
Sampson v Taylor, 29 NY2d 900, 1972.
71.
Wallace v Labrenz, 104 NE2d 769, 1952.
72.
In re Green, 292 A2d 387, 1972.
73.
Sigman GS, O'Connor C: Exploration for physicians
of the mature minor doctrine. J Pediatr 119:520–525, 1991.
74.
Tsai AK, Schafermeyer RW, Kalifon D, et al: Evaluation
and treatment of minors: Reference on consent. Ann Emerg Med 22:1211–1217,
1993.
75.
Mandatory parental consent to abortion. Council
on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association. JAMA 269:82–86,
1993.
76.
The adolescent's right to confidential care when
considering abortion. Committee on Adolescence, American Academy of Pediatrics.
Pediatrics 97:746–751, 1996.
77.
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists:
Patient choice and the maternal-fetal relationship. In
Ethics in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Washington, DC, American College of Obstetricians
and Gynecologists, 2002.
78.
Standards for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)
and emergency cardiac care (ECC). JAMA 227(Suppl):833–868, 1974.
79.
Optimal care for hopelessly ill patients. A report
of the Clinical Care Committee of the Massachusetts General Hospital. N Engl J Med
295:362–364, 1976.
80.
Fried C: Terminating life support: Out of the
closet. N Engl J Med 295:390–391, 1976.
81.
Rabkin MT, Gillerman G, Rice NR: Orders not to
resuscitate. N Engl J Med 295:364–366, 1976.
82.
In the Matter of Karen Quinlan, 70 NJ 10,335 A2d
647, cert denied, 429 US 922, 1976.
83.
Bartling v Superior Court, 163 Cal App3d 186 (209
Cal Rptr 220), 1984.
84.
Cruzan v Director, Missouri Department of Health,
110 SCt 2841, 1990.
85.
Annas GJ, Arnold B, Aroskar M, et al: Bioethicists'
statement on the U.S. Supreme Court's Cruzan decision. N Engl J Med 323:686–687,
1990.
86.
Emanuel EJ: Securing patients' right to refuse
medical care: In praise of the Cruzan decision. Am J Med 92:307–312, 1992.
87.
Decisions near the end of life. Council on Ethical
and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association. JAMA 267:2229–2233, 1992.
88.
Paola FA, Anderson JA: The process of dying.
In Sanbar SS, Gibofsky A, Firestone MH, et al (eds):
Legal Medicine, 3rd ed. St. Louis, Mosby-Year Book, 1995, pp 404–423.
89.
Emanuel LL, Barry MJ, Stoeckle JD, et al: Advance
directives for medical care—A case for greater use. N Engl J Med 324:889–895,
1991.
90.
Emanuel LL, Emanuel EJ: The medical directive:
A new comprehensive advance care document. JAMA 261:3288–3293, 1989.
91.
Brett AS: Limitations of listing specific medical
interventions in advance directives. JAMA 266:825–828, 1991.
92.
Truog RD: "Do-not-resuscitate" orders during anesthesia
and surgery. Anesthesiology 74:606–608, 1991.
93.
Statement of the American College of Surgeons on
Advance Directives by Patients: "Do not resuscitate" in the operating room. Bull
Am Coll Surg 79:29, 1994.
94.
American Society of Anesthesiologists: Ethical
guidelines for the anesthesia care of patients with do-not-resuscitate orders or
other directives that limit care. In 1999 Directory
of Members. Park Ridge, IL, American Society of Anesthesiologists, 1999, pp 470–471.
95.
Truog RD, Waisel DB, Burns JP: DNR in the OR:
A goal-directed approach. Anesthesiology 90:289–295, 1999.
96.
Waisel DB, Burns JP, Johnson JA, et al: Guidelines
for perioperative do-not-resuscitate policies. J Clin Anesth 14:467–473, 2002.
97.
Wenger NS, Pearson MJ, Desmond KA, et al: Epidemiology
of do-not-resuscitate orders: Disparity by age, diagnosis, gender, race, and functional
impairment. Arch Intern Med 155:2056–2062, 1995.
98.
Eliasson AH, Parker JM, Shorr AF, et al: Impediments
to writing do-not-resuscitate orders. Arch Intern Med 159:2213–2218, 1999.
99.
Clemency MV, Thompson NJ: Do not resuscitate orders
in the perioperative period: Patient perspectives. Anesth Analg 84:859–864,
1997.
100.
Richter J, Eisemann MR: The compliance of doctors
and nurses with do-not-resuscitate orders in Germany and Sweden. Resuscitation 42:203–209,
1999.
101.
Casarett DJ, Stocking CB, Siegler M: Would physicians
override a do-not-resuscitate order when a cardiac arrest is iatrogenic? J Gen Intern
Med:35–38, 1999.
102.
Bedell SE, Delbanco TL: Choices about cardiopulmonary
resuscitation in the hospital: When do physicians talk with patients? N Engl J
Med 310:1089–1093, 1984.
103.
Cammer-Paris BE, Carrion VG, Meditch JS Jr, et
al: Roadblocks to do-not-resuscitate orders: A study in policy implementation.
Arch Intern Med 153:1689–1695, 1993.
104.
Curtis JR, Park DR, Krone MR, et al: Use of the
medical futility rationale in do-not-attempt-resuscitation orders. JAMA 273:124–128,
1995.
105.
Gaba DM, Howard SK, Jump B: Production pressure
in the work environment: California anesthesiologists' attitudes and experiences.
Anesthesiology 81:488–500, 1994.
106.
Hakim RB, Teno JM, Harrell FE, et al: Factors
associated with do-not-resuscitate orders: Patients' preferences, prognosis, and
physicians' judgments. Ann Intern Med 125:284–293, 1996.
107.
Gaba DM, Fish KJ, Howard SK: Crisis Management
in Anesthesiology. New York, Churchill Livingstone, 1994.
108.
Clemency MV, Thompson NJ: "Do not resuscitate"
(DNR) orders in the perioperative period—A comparison of the perspectives of
anesthesiologists, internists, and surgeons. Anesth Analg 78:651–658, 1994.
109.
Clemency MV, Thompson NJ: "Do not resuscitate"
(DNR) orders and the anesthesiologist: A survey. Anesth Analg 76:394–401,
1993.
110.
Crawford LS: Verdicts are controversial, contradictory;
wrongful life cases: Damned if you do, damned if you don't. Med Malpract Law Strategy
15:1, 1998.
111.
Waisel DB, Truog RD: The cardiopulmonary resuscitation-not-indicated
order: Futility revisited. Ann Intern Med 122:304–308, 1995.
112.
Tomlinson T, Czlonka D: Futility and hospital
policy. Hastings Cent Rep 25:28–35, 1995.
113.
A controlled trial to improve care for seriously
ill hospitalized patients. The Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for
Outcomes and Treatments (SUPPORT). The SUPPORT Principal Investigators. JAMA 274:1591–1598,
1995.
114.
Fried TR, Bradley EH, Towle VR, et al: Understanding
the treatment preferences of seriously ill patients. N Engl J Med 346:1061–1066,
2002.
115.
In re the conservatorship of Helga M. Wanglie,
No PX-91-283, District Probate Division, 4th Judicial District of the County of Hennepin,
State of Minnesota, 1993.
116.
In the matter of Baby K. 16 F3d 590 (4th Cir),
1994.
117.
Gilgunn v Massachusetts General Hospital, SCt
Civ Action No 92-4820, Suffolk Co, MA, verdict April 21, 1995.
118.
Foley KM: Competent care for the dying instead
of physician-assisted suicide. N Engl J Med 336:54–58, 1997.
119.
Practice guidelines for cancer pain management:
A report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Pain Management,
Cancer Pain Section. Anesthesiology 84:1243–1257, 1996.
120.
Solomon MZ, O'Donnell L, Jennings B, et al: Decisions
near the end of life: Professional views on life-sustaining treatments. Am J Public
Health 83:14–23, 1993.
121.
Quill TE: The ambiguity of clinical intentions.
N Engl J Med 329:1039–1040, 1993.
122.
Quill Te, Dresser R, Brock DW: The rule of double
effect—A critique of its role in end-of-life decision making. N Engl J Med
337:1768–1781, 1997.
123.
Truog RD, Burns JP, Mitchell C, et al: Pharmacologic
paralysis and withdrawal of mechanical ventilation at the end of life. N Engl J
Med 342:508–511, 2000.
124.
Emanuel EJ: Euthanasia: Historical, ethical
and empiric processes. Arch Intern Med 154:1890–1901, 1994.
125.
van der Maas PJ, van Delden JJM, Pijnenborg L,
et al: Euthanasia and other medical decisions concerning the end of life. Lancet
338:669–674, 1991.
126.
van der Maas PJ, van der Wal G, Haverkate I, et
al: Euthanasia, physician-assisted suicide, and other medical practices involving
the end of life in the Netherlands, 1990–1995. N Engl J Med 335:1699–1705,
1996.
127.
Groenewoud JH, van der Heide A, Onwuteaka-Philipsen
BD, et al: Clinical problems with the performance of euthanasia and physician-assisted
suicide in the Netherlands. N Engl J Med 342:551–556, 2000.
128.
Nuland SB: Physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia
in practice. N Engl J Med 342:583–584, 2000.
129.
Washington v Glucksberg, 521 US 702, 1997.
130.
Vacco v Quill, 521 US 793, 1997.
131.
Snyder L, Sulmasy DP: Physician-assisted suicide.
Ann Intern Med 135:209–216, 2001.
132.
Hedberg K, Hopkins D, Kohn M: Five years of legal
physician-assisted suicide in Oregon [letter]. N Engl J Med 348:961–964, 2003.
133.
Van Norman G: A matter of life and death. What
every anesthesiologist should know about the medical, legal, and ethical aspects
of declaring brain death. Anesthesiology 91:275–287, 1999.
134.
Truog RD: Is it time to abandon brain death?
Hastings Cent Rep 27:29–37, 1997.
135.
Evans RW: The actual and potential supply of
organ donors in the United States. In Terasaki PI
(ed): Clinical Transplants 1990. Los Angeles, UCLA Tissue Typing Laboratory, 1990,
pp 329–341.
136.
Koogler T, Costarino AT Jr: The potential benefits
of the pediatric nonheartbeating organ donor. Pediatrics 101:1049–1052, 1998.
137.
Daemen JW, Kootstra G, Wijnen RM, et al: Nonheart-beating
donors: The Maastricht experience. In Terasaki
PI, Cecka JM (eds.): Clinical Transplants 1994. Los Angeles, UCLA Tissue Typing
Laboratory, 1994, pp 303–316.
138.
Grodin MA, Annas GJ: Legacies of Nuremberg:
Medical ethics and human rights. JAMA 276:1682–1683, 1996.
139.
Perisco JE: Nuremberg: Infamy on Trial. New
York, Penguin Books, 1994.
140.
Katz J: The consent principle of the Nuremberg
Code: Its significance then and now. In Annas GJ,
Grodin MA (eds): The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremberg Code. New York, Oxford University
Press, 1992, p 228.
141.
Annas GJ, Grodin MA: The Nazi Doctors and the
Nuremberg Code. New York, Oxford University Press, 1992.
142.
White House Advisory Committee on Human Radiation
Experiments: Final Report. Publication no. 061-000-00-848-9. Washington, DC, Advisory
Committee, 1995.
143.
Beecher HK: Ethics and clinical research. N
Engl J Med 274:1354–1360, 1966.
144.
National Commission for the Protection of Human
Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research: The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles
and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. Washington, DC,
Department of Health, Education and Welfare, 1979.
145.
U.S. Department of Human Services: 45 CFR 46.
Protection of Human Subjects. Federal Register, 2002.
146.
Appelbaum PS, Roth LH, Lidz CW, et al: False
hopes and best data: Consent to research and the therapeutic misconception. Hastings
Cent Rep 17:20–24, 1987.
147.
U.S. Department of Human Services: Protection
of Human Subjects, Definitions. 45 CFR 46.102, Federal Register, 2002.
148.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Protection
of Human Subjects, Exception from informed consent requirements for emergency research.
21 CFR 50.24, Federal Register, 2002.
149.
Thompson DF: Understanding financial conflicts
of interest. N Engl J Med 329:573–576, 1993.
150.
Hillman AL, Pauly MV, Kerstein JJ: How do financial
incentives affect physicians' clinical decisions and the financial performance of
health maintenance organizations? N Engl J Med 321:86–92, 1989.
