|
A good death includes pain management, aggressive comfort care, maintenance of dignity, a feeling of connectedness, and financial control.[118] One of the ways this is done is through hospice care, in which an interdisciplinary team optimizes the end-of-life period by providing medical, emotional, psychological, and spiritual care to the patient and by assisting the family in coping with their impending loss. By aggressively managing comfort issues, the patient is more able to focus on spiritual and relational matters.
Clinicians should sufficiently treat pain in the terminally ill patient and not be afraid that it may cause narcotic dependency or hasten death. [119] [120] This opinion is rooted in the doctrine of double effect, which places great emphasis on the intentions of clinicians in cases in which their actions may have both good and bad effects. The classic example is administration of morphine to relieve pain in the terminally ill patient near the end of life. Although two possible effects of the morphine are recognized and foreseen—relief of pain and respiratory depression—only the good effect (relief of pain) is intended, and the clinician is not held morally culpable if respiratory depression and an earlier death should occur.[121] The principle focuses on the intention of the clinician in seeking to provide comfort to terminally ill
Objections to the doctrine of double effect include accusations that it oversimplifies the concept of intentionality and, depending on interpretation, may release physicians from responsibility for their actions. It also centers the justification of the action on the physician's intent, rather than the patient's authorization.[122]
End-of-life care occurs in the intensive care unit and for patients
receiving mechanical ventilation. Anesthesiologists should be familiar with the
difficulties related to withdrawal of mechanical ventilation ( Table
89-4
). Questions surrounding withdrawal of treatment include questions
about the appropriateness of using neuromuscular blockade to minimize events such
as agonal respirations that make family members uncomfortable.[123]
Because neuromuscular blockade does not provide sedation or pain relief for the
patient and may even harm the achievement of these goals by impairing the clinician's
ability to assess
Needs of the Patient | Needs of the Family | Needs of the Clinical Team |
---|---|---|
To have fears of dying and dyspnea alleviated | To be with the patient | To have key aspects of end-of-life care performed and modeled by respected clinicians |
To be informed of planned events | To be helpful to the patient | To have a multidisciplinary team committed to cooperation, communication, and teamwork |
To have pain, distress, and symptoms managed | To be assured of the patient's comfort | To receive ongoing education about performing clinical palliative care, supporting and counseling patients and families, and respecting religious and cultural beliefs |
To be treated with respect and dignity | To be informed of the patient's changing condition | To have administrative support for palliative care |
To have family and friends present | To express emotions | To have the patient remain in her or his unit throughout the intensive palliative care period, unless transferring is in the best interests of the patient or family |
To have cultural beliefs honored | To be accepted, supported, and comforted by family members and health professionals | To have opportunities for bereavement and debriefing |
To have spiritual meaning | To be assured that their decisions were right | To be cognizant of policies and regulations about autopsy and organ donation |
|
To find meaning in the dying of their loved one |
|
|
To be fed, hydrated, and rested |
|
|
To be informed of bad news in private by a presentable senior team member in a compassionate manner using plain language (e.g., saying died instead of unsuccessful resuscitation) |
|
Adapted from Truog RD, Cist AF, Brackett SE, et al: Recommendations for end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: The Ethics Committee of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. Crit Care Med 29:2332–2348, 2001. |
|