|
More than 30 years ago, Donabedian[22] proposed that we measure the quality of health care by observing its structure, processes, and outcomes. The IOM has defined health care quality in the United States as "the degree to which health services for individuals and populations increase the likelihood of desired health outcomes and are consistent with current professional knowledge."[23] The IOM's definition and framework incorporate two of Donabedian's three elements in a broad approach to measuring health care quality: determining effects of health care on desired outcomes, including a relative improvement in health and in consumers' evaluations or experience of health care, and assessing the degree to which health care adheres to processes proved by scientific evidence or agreed by professional consensus to affect health or that concur with patients' preferences.
Although efforts to evaluate how the structure of care affects patient outcomes have been limited, evidence regarding the impact of intensive care unit (ICU) organizational characteristics on patient safety and on quality of care is fairly well developed. There is significant evidence to support the association between ICU physician and nurse staffing and mortality, complications, and length of stay.[11] [24]
To help provide feedback regarding the quality of care provided, varied audiences need health care quality measures that they can use for health care purchasing, regulatory accreditation and monitoring, or performance improvement. [25] [26] [27] For all these purposes, it is imperative that quality measures be important, scientifically sound, usable across settings, and feasible.
Measures of processes and outcomes are the lenses through which we can see the quality of care we provide. Looking at independent measures of quality may not give us the whole picture, but if we put all the measures together, we get a more accurate picture of quality. Quality measures, like the pictures, help us to know the quality of care provided from a variety of different perspectives. Through each picture, we get to know the many facets of quality. As such, it may be more appropriate to refer to the qualities of care we provide.
The IOM has further suggested some categories for these qualities of care. Health care should be safe, patient-centered, timely, efficient, and equitable. [5] [25] [28] Whereas the aims of effectiveness and safety of health care are nearly universal, societies and cultures around the world differ in how much they emphasize the additional aims of patient-centeredness, timeliness, efficiency, and equity. This avails those seeking to improve with a wider spectrum of dimensions on which to customize their improvements. Process of care measures of quality assess whether providers perform health care processes that achieve the desired aims and avoid those processes that predispose to harm.
Because the goal of measurement is to learn and improve, the measurement system must fit into an improvement system. Briefly, we find it useful to assume that there are three key components of this system. First, there must be the will among caregivers to work cooperatively to improve. Second, there must be ideas or hypotheses about changes to the current system of care. Third, the team must have a model for testing changes and implementing those that result in improvements.[29] As such, the ability to measure, to know if a change is an improvement, is fundamental to any improvement system.[30] Although the ideas of quality measures discussed previously apply to groups of patients, many of the efforts to improve patient safety are targeted at individual patients.
|