INTRAVENOUS FLUID THERAPY
An awareness of fluid balance has its beginnings in the writings
of Claude Bernard, who in his final published work emphasized the importance of the
extracellular fluid in the support of vital functions.[176]
In these writings, he stressed that blood and lymph bathe the cells of the body
and that these fluids constitute the milieu interne,
later called the fluid-matrix by Walter Cannon.
These researchers pointed out that the organism's freedom from external disturbances
such as hunger, thirst, and cold is brought about by mechanisms that maintain uniformity
of the bodily fluids. The concept of the steady state maintained in this internal
environment became known as homeostasis in the Cannon
doctrine.[177]
During anesthesia, many of the homeostatic
mechanisms are abolished or severely blunted, and the anesthesiologist must assume
the role of maintaining a favorable milieu interne.
Crystalloids
In the late 19th century, the sodium content of serum was found
to be roughly equivalent to an aqueous solution of 0.9% sodium chloride, and this
became known as physiologic salt solution. Hartog J. Hamburger (1856–1924)
showed a volume change in red blood cells at concentrations above and below 0.9%
saline.[178]
As a result of these experiments,
the value of sodium ions in the maintenance of osmotic pressure in the serum was
realized. Ernest H. Starling[179]
(1866–1927)
extended these observations to explain edema formation on the basis of hydrostatic
and colloidal osmotic pressures.
Maintenance of fluid balance was not a priority or even a possibility
for those who administered anesthetics during the 19th century. Without intravenous
access, there was little the anesthesia provider could do if the surgeon was recklessly
losing blood. The importance of intravenously administered salt in patients with
dehydration
from cholera was observed in 1831 by William B. O'Shaughnessy[180]
(1804–1889). Although there were isolated successful attempts to treat the
dehydration of cholera with saline infusions, the treatment did not flourish, and
the victory over cholera was finally won only through improved sanitary conditions.
The experimental introduction of saline infusions after surgery
was based on work performed by Emil Schwarz[181]
(1852–1918), who observed that saline infusions could save the lives of bled
rabbits. This work was recognized by Johann J. Bischoff[182]
(1841–1892), who reported that a salt infusion saved the life of a woman with
severe post-partum hemorrhage. Treatment with salt infusions was generally adopted
after surgical hemorrhage, but sepsis and failed attempts to revive the bleeding
patient soon became apparent.
Alternative solutions to saline originated with Sydney Ringer
[183]
(1835–1910), Professor of Medicine at
University College, London. Ringer observed that saline prepared from distilled
water was not as effective as saline made from pipe water in maintaining the contractility
of the isolated frog heart. After a careful analysis of the pipe water, he learned
that it contained the impurities of calcium and potassium. Adding these cations
to the saline made from distilled water proved his hypothesis that these ions played
an important role in maintaining normal cardiac function.
In the first decades of the 20th century, there were substantial
barriers to the successful use of parenteral electrolyte solutions during surgery.
Closed sterile administration sets and intravenous cannulas were slow to develop,
and alternative methods therefore were employed. Most patients received several
liters of fluid, usually administered rectally; however, salt was administered, if
possible, orally or by subcutaneous injection. With these ineffectual methods, the
use of saline in the perioperative period fell into decline. In 1944, a syndrome
was described as postoperative salt intolerance,
caused ostensibly by the failure of the kidney to excrete a salt load.[184]
These ideas had the support of the influential Francis D. Moore, Chief of Surgery
at Peter Bent Brigham Hospital in Boston. When intravenous therapy became more widely
available, patients were often administered dextrose and water or dilute sodium-containing
solutions. Carl Moyer[185]
(1908–1970) presented
evidence in 1950 that sodium was avidly retained postoperatively and argued against
the use of saline for perioperative fluid maintenance.
The reintroduction of perioperative saline therapy began in 1959,
when G. Shires[186]
[187]
and associates reported the redistribution of extracellular fluids into "third space"
compartments during extensive surgical procedures. These reports encouraged preoperative
fluid administration to compensate for the lack of oral intake and intraoperative
sodium-containing fluid administration to replace translocation of extracellular
fluid into edematous spaces such as gut and peritoneum. The increased use of saline
reduced the incidence of postoperative renal failure and decreased the requirement
for blood transfusions. As a result of these studies, fluid replacement today consists
of saline-containing fluids, with the addition of colloid and blood when excessive
blood loss occurs.[188]