Previous Next

Fire Hazards

Although fires in hyperbaric chambers are rare, they are usually lethal. The effects of fire at elevated ambient pressure are so devastating and occur so fast that the fire extinguisher system may not be activated until all occupants of the chamber have died. The very real risk of fire in hyperbaric chambers has been illustrated by recent accidents in which chamber fires were started by a hand warmer, a sparking toy, and other sources of ignition carried into the chamber in the patient's clothing. Minimization of these risks involves the following:

Control of chamber O2 concentrations (irrelevant in a monoplace chamber)

Minimizing the use of combustible materials within the chamber

Controlling sources of heat and spark

Chamber fire extinguisher system

The geometric increase in the burning rate with increases in O2 concentration mandates careful monitoring of chamber O2 , as already noted. At increased ambient pressure, burning occurs more rapidly, even when the O2 concentration is 21%. It is important to ensure that patients do not carry cigarette lighters, matches, battery-operated devices, or other sources of combustion into the chamber. Cotton garments should be worn because they tend to not result in buildup of static charges. Flameretardant materials may be of benefit, but in a monoplace


2685
chamber they will probably burn nearly as quickly as untreated material. Excess hair grease should be removed. Humidification of O2 within the head tent will help minimize the risk of buildup of static electricity in hair. Hydrocarbon lubricants (e.g., for stretcher wheels) should be scrupulously avoided because they may spontaneously ignite on contact with aluminum in the presence of high O2 tension. Nonflammable fluorocarbon lubricants are recommended.

Sources of sparks from electrically powered equipment should be minimized. Plugging and unplugging electrical cables during hyperbaric treatment are a source of sparking that can be eliminated by taping all electrical plugs into female receptacles before compression. In multiplace chambers, the flammability of electrically powered devices (e.g., intravenous controllers) can be reduced by purging with 100% nitrogen or helium through ports drilled in the covering at a rate sufficient to keep the O2 concentration at a level that does not support combustion (typically at a flow rate two to three times the internal volume per minute). Electrical systems used in monoplace chambers must comply with specific codes that specify the types of switches, grounding, and insulation that can be used.[145]

Volatile anesthetics in high concentration can be combustible at 1 ATA. Brown and Morris observed that in 100% O2 , halothane up to saturation (≅33%) in an open tube was nonflammable. In a closed tube, concentrations of 20% to 22.5% would allow propagation of ignition. Lower halothane concentrations propagated ignition when nitrous oxide was used as the diluent gas.[190] Electrical sparking did not result in ignition of enflurane at concentrations up to 5% in 100% O2 or N2 O in a closed tube at 3 ATA.[191] Isoflurane and sevoflurane Dräger vaporizers have been used with 100% O2 up to 3 ATA, with no evidence of spontaneous combustion at room temperature. Given the experience with halothane under hyperbaric conditions—no reported fires and resistance to combustion in 100% O2 at 1 ATA—in the absence of a source of ignition, it is not likely that any of the modern volatile anesthetics pose a fire safety hazard in a hyperbaric environment.

Previous Next