|
The simplest and least invasive form of cardiac monitoring remains measurement of the heart rate. As a circulatory vital sign, the heart rate provides an important guide to the patient's baseline condition and the influence of anesthetics and surgical stimuli. The ability to estimate the heart rate quickly with a "finger on the pulse" is a skill as important as this expression is common. However, under most circumstances in modern anesthesia practice, electronic monitoring devices are used to provide a continuous, numeric display of the heart rate.
Although any monitor that senses the period of the cardiac cycle can be used to determine the heart rate, the most common technique applied in the operating room is the ECG. Current monitors use multiple ECG leads to sense cardiac electrical activity.[18] This redundancy aids in detection of the R wave and improves the accuracy of heart rate measurement. As a result, a single noisy lead, or one in which the R waves are of very low amplitude, will not prevent the monitor from calculating the heart rate accurately.
ECG measurement of the heart rate begins with accurate detection of the R wave and measurement of the R-R interval. The digital value displayed for the heart rate is generated from an algorithm designed to count and average a certain number of beats and then display a number that is updated every 5 to 15 seconds. [19] As a result, transient changes in heart rate may have little impact on the displayed digital value. For example, consider an episode of complete heart block that interrupts slow sinus rhythm. Depending on the algorithm used by the monitor, the digital value for heart rate may show only a slight reduction from the baseline value. In this instance, the heart rate of 49 beats/min displayed by the monitor fails to alert the clinician to the dangerous transient bradyarrhythmia ( Fig. 32-1 ). Although the monitor could update the digital value for the heart rate after each beat calculated from the R-R interval, numbers would then be flashing on the display screen, changing with each heartbeat, because of the normal physiologic beat-to-beat variability in heart rate. Instead, the displayed digital value
Figure 32-1
Digital heart rate (HR) displays may fail to warn of
dangerous bradyarrhythmias. Direct observation of the electrocardiogram (ECG) and
the arterial blood pressure traces reveals complete heart block and a 4-second period
of asystole, whereas the digital display reports an HR of 49 beats/min. Note that
the ECG filter (arrow) corrects the baseline drift
so that the trace remains on the recording screen. (From Mark JB: Atlas
of Cardiovascular Monitoring. New York, Churchill Livingstone, 1998, Fig. 13-2.)
Occasionally, the clinician must check electrode attachment, increase ECG signal gain, or select alternative ECG leads to facilitate heart rate monitoring. Some monitors allow manual adjustment of the threshold or sensitivity for R-wave detection. Despite these measures, the monitor may display inaccurate heart rates when patient movement or other electrical interference distorts the ECG trace. In the operating room, such interference frequently occurs when the electrosurgical unit is in use. The ECG trace should always be visually inspected to confirm the numeric value for the heart rate displayed on the monitor. Spurious values are recognized quickly, and the true heart rate can be estimated from the ECG waveform tracing. In addition, the arterial pressure waveform or the pulse oximeter plethysmograph should be used to confirm the pulse rate in these instances.
Electrical interference in the ECG trace may arise from sources other than the electrosurgical unit. Power line noise appears as a 60-Hz artifact and may be eliminated by selecting narrower-bandpass ECG filters, including a 60-Hz notch filter. Other artifacts result from muscle twitching and fasciculations, as well as various medical devices, including lithotripsy machines, cardiopulmonary bypass equipment, and fluid warmers.[20] Paced rhythms often produce problems with ECG measurement of the heart rate. When tall pacing spikes are present, the monitor may misinterpret these high-amplitude signals as R waves and miscalculate the heart rate. Tall T waves may produce the same artifact when the monitor mistakenly counts these T waves as R waves. These problems may be lessened by decreasing ECG gain, adjusting R-wave detection sensitivity, or changing the ECG lead to one with a smaller pacing spike or T-wave amplitude.
|