Previous Next

OPERATING ROOM INFORMATION SYSTEMS

It is hard to imagine that ORs, the largest and most complex areas of the hospital, which are also the site of the greatest revenue (as well as costs), are not more fully developed in information technology. The OR has been


3132
referred to as being data rich but information poor. Hospitals in general have been thought to be 10 to 20 years behind industry in developing information management. However, information systems are critical for the OR director to effectively run this area. A well-designed system can provide many benefits, including OR scheduling, automated records, materials management, preoperative data, laboratory tracking, medication tracking, cost data, patient tracking, and quality improvement/quality assessment (QI/QA).[68] [69] [70] [71] [72] [73] Most hospitals now only use the basics of such systems to manage scheduling, generate statistical reports, and create equipment lists.

These information systems are complex and expensive. The need for information systems to integrate large volumes of information from many different sources has been a challenge for companies. It has been estimated that a single OR case creates over 1 million data bits in 3 hours.[74] However, manual transcription of this information is also problematic. Legibility, medical errors, regulatory compliance, and legal concerns make manual record keeping less than ideal. Manual entry also requires significant time; it has been estimated that 30% to 40% of an anesthesia provider's time in the OR is spent functioning as a scribe for information.[74]

Hospitals have been slow to adopt information systems in the OR for a variety of reasons. These systems are expensive, with costs averaging 1 to 2 million dollars for a medium-sized hospital. Integration of the new system into the OR requires a lot of work and the continual support of a systems manager. Vendor credibility in delivering all the advertised benefits of the system has also been of concern. Hospitals frequently want to see a return-on-investment analysis to justify the expense of these systems. These systems may provide value by improving charge data and managing equipment and personnel better. A detailed information management system is invaluable to the OR director. Data on OR resources allow improved QI/QA assessment. Clear, accurate information allows the OR manager to focus on areas of improvement and create behavior changes in the system. Information systems should not be considered a luxury but rather a necessity for the OR director to monitor the OR process and make the necessary changes to remain efficient and competitive.

Previous Next