Book Text

REFERENCES

1. Talamini M, Campbell K, Stanfield C: Robotic gastrointestinal surgery: Early experience and system description. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 12:225–232, 2002.

2. Satava R: Surgical robotics: the early chronicles: A personal historical perspective. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12:6–16, 2002.

3. http://www.shuttlepresskit.com/scom/221.pdf

4. Fisher SS, McGreevy MM, Humphries J, et al: Virtual environment display system. In Crow F, Pizer S (eds): Proceedings of the Workshop on Interactive 3-Dimensional Graphics. New York, ACM, 1986, pp 1–12.

5. Green PS, Hill JH, Satava RM, et al: Telepresence: Dextrous procedures in a virtual operating field [abstract]. Surg Endosc 57:192, 1991.

6. Marescaux J, Leroy J, Rubino F, et al: Transcontinental robot-assisted remote telesurgery: Feasibility and potential application. Ann Surg 235:487–92, 2002.

7. Marescaux J, Leroy J, Gagner M, et al: Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery. Nature 413:379–80, 2001.

8. Dubois F, Icard P, Berthelot G, et al: Celioscopic cholecystectomy: Preliminary report of 36 cases. Ann Surg 211:60–2, 1990.

9. Perissat J, Collet DR, Belliard R: Gallstones: Laparoscopic treatment, intracorporeal lithotripsy followed by cholecystostomy or cholecystectomy—A personal technique. Endoscopy Suppl 1:373–374, 1989.

10. http://www.computermotion.com/productsandsolutions/products/zeus/index.cfm

11. Schurr MO, Arezzo A, Neisius B, et al: Trocar and instrument positioning system TISKA: An assist device for endoscopic solo surgery. Surg Endosc 13:528–531, 1999.

12. Schurr MO, Arezzo A, Buess GF: Robotics and systems technology for advanced endoscopic procedure: Experiences in general surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 16:S97–S105, 1999.

13. Buess GF, Arezzo A, Schurr MO, et al: A new remote controlled endoscope positioning system for endoscopic solo surgery. The FIPS Endoarm. Surg Endosc 13:528–531, 2000.

14. Schurr MO, Buess G, Neisius B, et al: Robotics and telemanipulation technologies for endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 14:375–381, 2000.

15. Cassack D: In vivo: The business and medicine report. Norwalk, CT, Windhover Information, 2000.

16. Vannier MW, Haller JW: Navigation in diagnosis and therapy. Eur J Radiol 31:132–140, 1999.

2570

17. Falk V, McLoughlin G, Guthart G, et al: Dexterity enhancement in endoscopic surgery by a computer-controlled mechanical wrist. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 8:235–242, 1999.

18. Ruurda JP, van Vroonhoven TJ, Broeders IA: Robot-assisted surgical systems: A new era in laparoscopic surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 84:223–226 2002.

19. Himpens J, Leman G, Cadiere GB: Telesurgical laparoscopic cholecystectomy [letter]. Surg Endosc 12:1091, 1998.

20. Chapman W, Albrecht R, Kim V, et al: Computer-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy with the da Vinci surgical robot. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 12:155–159, 2002.

21. Melvin WS, Needleman BJ, Krause KR, et al: Computer-assisted robotic Heller myotomy: Initial case report. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 11:251–253, 2001.

22. Cheah W, Clark O, Horn J, et al: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma. World J Surg 26:1048–1051, 2002.

23. Tulandi T (ed): Atlas of Laparoscopic and Hysterectomy Techniques. London, WB Saunders, 1999.

24. Parr KG, Talamini MA: Anesthetic implications of the addition of an operative robot for endoscopic surgery: A case report. J Clin Anesth 14:228–233, 2002.

25. Cunningham AJ, Brull SJ: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Anesthetic implications. Anesth Analg 76:1120–1133, 1993.

26. Kim VB, Chapman WH, Albrecht RJ, et al: Early experience with telemanipulative laparoscopic cholecystectomy using da Vinci. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12:33–40, 2002.

27. Nataf P, Al-Attar N, Ramadan R, et al: Thoracoscopic IMA takedown. J Card Surg 15:278–282, 2000.

28. Loulmet D, Carpentier A, d'Attellis N, et al: Endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting with the aid of robotic assisted instruments. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 118:4–10, 1999.

29. Dogan S, Wimmer-Greinecker G, Andressen E, et al: Totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass (TECAB) grafting and closure of an atrial septal defect using the da Vinci system, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 48(Suppl):21, 1999.

30. Torracca L, Ismeno G, Quarti A, et al: Totally endoscopic atrial septal defect closure with a robotic system: Experience with seven cases. Heart Surg Forum 5:125–127, 2002.

31. Reichenspruner H, Boehm DH, Welz A, et al: A 3D-video- and robot-assisted minimally invasive ASD closure using the port-access techniques. Heart Surg Forum 1:104–106, 1998.

32. Reichenspruner H, Boehm DH, Gulbins H, et al: Three dimensional video- and robot-assisted port-access mitral valve operation. Ann Thorac Surg 69:1176–1182, 2000.

33. Onnasch J, Schneider F, Falk V, et al: Five years of less invasive mitral valve surgery: From experimental to routine approach. Heart Surg Forum 5:132–135, 2002.

34. Onnasch J, Schneider F, Falk V, et al: Minimally invasive approach for redo mitral valve surgery: A true benefit for the patient. J Card Surg 17:14–19, 2002.

35. Felger J, Nifong L, Chitwood W: The evolution of and early experience with robot-assisted mitral valve surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12:58–63, 2002.

36. Chitwood WR, Nifong LW: Minimally invasive videoscopic mitral valve surgery: The current role of surgical robotics. J Card Surg 15:61–75, 2000.

37. Le Bret E, Papadatos S, Folliguet T, et al: Interruption of patent ductus arteriosus in children: Robotically assisted versus video thoracoscopic surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 123:973–976, 2002.

38. Decampli WM: Video-assisted thoracic surgical procedures in children. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu 1:61–74, 1998.

39. Damiano RJ, Ehrman WJ, Ducko CT, et al: Initial United States clinical trial of robotically assisted endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 119:77–82, 2000.

40. Dogan S, Aybek T, Andressen E, et al: Totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting on cardiopulmonary bypass with robotically enhanced telemanipulation: Report of forty-five cases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 123:1125–1131, 2002.

41. Dogan S, Aybek T, Khan M, et al: Computer-enhanced telemanipulation enables a variety of totally endoscopic cardiac procedures. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 50:281–286, 2002.

42. Ascione R, Lloyd CT, Underwood MJ, et al: Inflammatory response after coronary revascularization with or without cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 69:1198–1204, 2000.

43. Mack MJ: Cardiac surgery: The future is minimal! J Card Surg 15:6–8, 2000.

44. Mack MJ: Minimally invasive and robotic surgery. JAMA 285:568–572, 2001.

45. Carpentier A, Loulmet D, Carpentier A, et al: Open heart operation under videosurgery and mini thoracotomy. First case (mitral valvuloplasty) operated with success. C R Acad Sci III 319:219–223, 1996.

46. Mohr FW, Falk V, Diegeler A, et al: Computer-enhanced "robotic" cardiac surgery: Experience in 148 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 121:842–853, 2001.

47. Mehta N, Goswami S, Argenziano M, et al: Anesthesia for robotic repair of the mitral valve: A report of two cases. Anesth Analg 96:7–10, 2003.

48. Felger JE, Nifong LW, Chitwood WR: Robotic cardiac valve surgery: Transcending the technologic crevasse! Curr Opin Cardiol 16:146–151, 2001.

49. Vassiliades T: Technical aids to performing thoracoscopic robotically assisted internal mammary artery harvesting. Heart Surg Forum 5:119–124, 2002.

50. Vassiliades T: The cardiopulmonary effects of single-lung ventilation and carbon dioxide insufflation during thoracoscopic internal mammary artery harvesting. Heart Surg Forum 5:22–24, 2002.

51. Vassiliades TA, Rogers EW, Nielsen JL, et al: Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting: Intermediateterm results. Ann Thorac Surg 70:1063–1065, 2000.

52. Boyd WD, Rayman R, Desai ND, et al: Closed-chest coronary artery bypass grafting on the beating heart with the use of a computer-enhanced surgical robotic system. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 120:807–809, 2000.

53. Falk V, Diegeler A, Walther T, et al: Total endoscopic off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Heart Surg Forum 3:29–31, 2000.

54. Chichon R, Kappert U, Walther T, et al: Endo-wrist enhanced surgical techniques in coronary artery disease using the da Vinci robotic system: Experience in 74 patients. Cardiovasc Surg 8(Suppl):4, 2000.

55. Reichenspurner H, Damiano RJ, Mack M, et al: Use of the voice-controlled and computer-assisted surgical system ZEUS for endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 118:11–16, 1999.

56. Falk V, Diegeler A, Walther T, et al: Total endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 17:38–45, 2000.

57. Reichenspurner H, Boehm DH, Gulbins H, et al: Robotically assisted endoscopic coronary artery bypass procedures without cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 118:960–961, 1999.

58. Falk V, Diegler A, Walther T, et al: Developments in robotic cardiac surgery. Curr Opin Cardiol 15:378–387, 2000.

59. Falk V, Fann JI, Grünenfelder J, et al: Endoscopic Doppler for detecting vessels in closed chest bypass grafting. Heart Surg Forum 3:331–333, 2000.

60. Melfi FM, Menconi GF, Mariani AM: Early experience with robotic technology for thoracoscopic surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 21:864–868, 2002.

61. Dupont FW: Anesthesia for esophageal surgery. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 4:2–17, 2000.

62. Ryu SI, Chang SD, Kim DH, et al: Image-guided hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery to spinal lesions. Neurosurgery 49:838–846, 2001.

63. Nathan MS, Wickham JEA, Davies B, et al: Robotic transurethral electroevaporization of the prostate. Minim Invasive Ther 4:283–287, 1995.

64. Davies BL, Hibberd RD, Ng WS, et al: The development of a surgeon robot for prostatectomies. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 205:35–38, 1991.

2571

65. Miyazaki Y, Yamaguchi A, Hara S: The value of transrectal ultrasonography in preoperative assessment for transurethral prostatectomy. J Urol 129:48–50, 1983.

66. Guillonneau B, Vallancien G: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: The Montsouris experience. J Urol 163:418–422, 2000.

67. Binder J, Kramer W: Robotically-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 87:408–410, 2001.

68. Rassweiler J, Binder J, Frede T: Robotic and telesurgery: Will they change our future? Curr Opin Urol 11:309–320, 2001.

69. Tewari A, Peabody J, Sarle R, et al: Technique of da Vinci robot-assisted anatomic radical prostatectomy. Urology 60:569–572, 2002.

70. Rassweiler J, Sentker L, Seemann O, et al: Heilbronn laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Technique and results after 100 cases. Eur Urol 40:54–64, 2001.

71. Degueldre M, Vandromme J, Huong PH, Cadiere GB: Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal reanastomosis: A feasibility study. Fertil Steril 74:1020–1023, 2000.

72. Faclone T, Goldberg JM, Margossian H, et al: Robotic assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis: A human pilot study. Fertil Steril 73:1040–1042, 2000.

73. Stoianovici D: Robotic surgery. World J Urol 18:289–295, 2000.

74. Bargar WL, Bauer A, Borner M: Primary and revision total hip replacement using the ROBODOC system. J Clin Orthop 354:82–91, 1998.

75. Bauer A, Borner M. Lahmer A: Primary and revision THR using the ROBODOC system. In Proceedings of the Computer Aided Orthopedic Surgery Conference, Center for Orthopedic Research, Shadyside Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, 1998.

76. Moody JE, DiGioia AM, Jaramaz B, et al: Gauging clinical practice: Surgical navigation for total hip replacement. In Wells WM, Colchester A, Delp S (eds): Computer Assisted Interventions. Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 1998.

77. Howe R, Matsuoka Y: Robotics for surgery. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 1:211–240, 1999.

78. Aglietti P, Buzzi R, Gaudenzi A: Patellofemoral functional results and complications with posterior stabilized total condylar knee prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 3:17–25, 1988.

79. Siemionow M, Ozer K, Siemionow W, et al: Robotic assistance in microsurgery. J Reconst Microsurg 16:643–649, 2000.

80. Taylor RH, Jensen M, Whitcomb L, et al: A steady-hand robotic system for microsurgical augmentation. Int J Robot Res 12:1201–1210, 1999.

81. Riviere CN, Jensen PS: A study of instrument motion in retinal microsurgery. Presented at the 21st annual conference of IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Chicago, IL, June 26, 2000.

82. D'Attellis N, Loulmet D, Carpentier A, et al: Robotic-assisted cardiac surgery: Anesthetic and postoperative considerations. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 16:397–400, 2002.

2570

2571

2572