Modes of Release of Chemical and Biological Warfare
Agents
Chemical Agent Release
Military Release
In warfare, the release of CBW agents is a deliberate action achieved
by the use of shells or missiles or through spraying ( Table
64-3
). Aerosol release is the essential technique that allows attack through
the respiratory route, but for more persistent agents that are designed to deny terrain,
the use of spray devices is more common. By the end of World War I, chemical warfare
agents were almost exclusively delivered by means of explosive shells, and by the
end of the war, 40% of the fills were chemical, indicating the effectiveness of chemical
warfare agents on the battlefield. The rise of aerial bombardment before World War
II brought great fears that cities would be wiped out by gas attacks, but these fears
were never substantiated, and it is now realized that dissemination of chemical warfare
agents over a wide area (rather than a limited tactical area) by explosion is not
easy. During the Cold War, the Russians developed considerable expertise in the
use of BM21/24 multiple rocket launchers (Stalin Organs), which could deliver a high
concentration of nonpersistent agents such as hydrogen cyanide during a short period
and then allow dispersal and the entry of unprotected troops. Missiles such as the
Scud were developed for chemical weapon release at this time, and it was feared that
they had been developed for use by Iraq before the Gulf War of 1991.
In the military context, release of toxic agents may be revealed
or concealed. Attack by whatever means is usually predicted and detectable with
the considerable resources that the military can bring to bear in this area for chemical
and biological agents. Tuned detection systems are
TABLE 64-3 -- Chemical and biological warfare agent releases: military and civilian approaches
Military Approaches |
Intelligence reports enable anticipation of toxic releases. |
Analysis of hazards and threats is available. |
Previous experience |
Tuned detection systems for specified hazards |
Generic detection systems |
Ordered responses |
Appreciation of the nature of the event by combat-trained personnel |
Civilian Approaches |
Toxic agent release is usually accidental. |
Natural epidemics |
Casualties may be the first indication of the nature of the incident. |
No fixed detection systems |
Ability to respond without battlefield constraints |
Widespread HAZMAT system of hazard control |
Uncontrolled and usually ill-disciplined population |
employed wherever there is perceived to be a threat, and the threat itself is usually
supported by intelligence information about the hazards concerned, which means that
the systems can be tuned. Broad detection systems, such as mass spectrography, are
also employed by CBW reconnaissance units in the field ( Table
64-4
).
Release on a Civilian Population
Toxic agent release on a civilian population is usually accidental
and is usually revealed by the circumstances of the accident. Road and other transportation
accidents, particularly when vehicles carrying HAZMAT plates are involved, gives
an immediate warning about the nature of the problem.[19]
Despite this, accidental releases, particularly in nations with poor emergency response
resources, can be catastrophic, as in the case of the mass release of methyl isocyanate
in the Indian city of Bhopal in 1984, which caused more than 5000 deaths and 50,000
casualties.[26]
Civilian populations, unlike their
military counterparts, are usually untrained and unprotected against toxic agents
release. The panic induced by the fear of the actions of
TABLE 64-4 -- Detection and monitoring
Detection of a chemical or biological
warfare agent means identifying its presence in a contaminated environment. |
Monitoring is a process by which
contamination on an exposed patient is detected. |
Detection Techniques |
Agent-specific chemistry |
Generic chemical detection techniques |
Mass spectrography |
Ion current devices |
Bioluminescence |
Microbial techniques |
Chemical-pathologic studies of an affected patient after the
attack |
Internal versus external detection |
CBW agents compounds the flexibility of the emergency medical response.
Biological Warfare Agent Release
The deliberate release of classic biologic warfare agents such
as bacteria or viruses may not be as easy as the media have led the public to believe.
Effective mass release implies aerosol release, and very few biological warfare
agents are capable of withstanding the environmental stresses involved. Some, such
as anthrax spores, have long been recognized as being sufficiently robust and have
therefore attracted the most research attention. The only other bacteria that have
probably been used as biological warfare agents are Tularemia,
spread through infected fodder, and Yersinia (plague),
which was said to have been used by the Japanese during World War II in their campaign
against China and where the vector used was the traditional one of the rat-borne
flea.[13]
Considerable research work was carried
out by the Soviet Union during the Cold War to try to find new ways of delivering
biological agents and for their modification using genetic engineering.[15]
This work also developed agents of biologic origin that lie in the middle of the
CBW spectrum and that produce subtle pathophysiologic effects and are difficult to
detect postmortem in the body. In military terms, biological warfare has always
been seen as a debilitating weapon, self-promulgating and of long latency, which
could be used to degrade the capability of static enemy formations or key formations
operating behind front lines, such as airfields. In the civilian context, the potential
use by terrorists has yet to be established, but the current rationale is to cause
"terror" in populations in developed countries, where mass epidemics are usually
rare.
|