DEVELOPMENT OF INHALATION AGENTS
Chloroform
Within a year after the introduction of ether anesthesia, the
search had already begun for other agents that could anesthetize without some of
the problems associated with ether. Although ether was a remarkably safe agent,
even when administered by untrained hands, there were disadvantages, which included
flammability, a prolonged induction, unpleasant odor that was persistent, and a high
incidence of nausea and vomiting. James Young Simpson (1811–1870), an obstetrician
from Edinburgh, Scotland, used ether in 1846 but was determined to find a better
agent. As early as January of 1847, he began experimenting with a variety of different
solvents and volatile liquids.[125]
The physician David Waldie, a contemporary of Simpson at Edinburgh
Medical School who was practicing in Liverpool, England, suggested chloroform as
an alternative agent. Synthesized independently by Samuel Guthrie[126]
(1782–1848), Eugene Soubeiran[127]
(1787–1858),
and Justus von Liebig[128]
(1803–1873) in
1831, it had never been tested in humans as an inhaled anesthetic. Marie Jean Flourens
[129]
(1794–1867) had used chloroform in dogs
while studying the stages in the depression of the central nervous system by chloroform
and ether. Simpson and a group of friends learned of the surprising potency of chloroform
at a dinner party hosted by Simpson on September 4, 1847. Dinner was followed by
the experimental inhalation of volatile drugs, and the use of chloroform was followed
by stupor and coma by several participants, including Simpson. Simpson promoted
chloroform vigorously, and its use was widely accepted in England. As an obstetrician,
he advocated its use during labor, promoting, along with others,[130]
the employment of analgesics during parturition. Initially, his views conflicted
with those of medical authorities who considered it unsafe during labor and with
those of religious authorities who opposed it on theologic grounds. Edinburgh had
a black history on the issue of pain relief during childbirth. In 1591, a young
woman named Euphanie Macalyane was burned alive as punishment for seeking pain relief
during labor on direct order from the King of Scotland, James VI.[131]
Simpson was not a timid man and met the religious controversy with direct quotations
from the Bible that appeared to support his views (Genesis 2, 21: "and the Lord
God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his
ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof.").
Chloroform was used widely in England, but controversy developed
about its safety, particularly in otherwise healthy subjects, those in whom a physician
would not anticipate any difficulties. Various commissions and committees were formed,
notably the two Hyderabad commissions (1888 and 1890),[132]
to investigate the relative safety of chloroform. In the late 19th century, Hyderabad,
a city in the middle of the Indian subcontinent, was the capital of the independent
State of Hyderabad, ruled by the Nizam, Mir Mehboob Ali Khan.
The Nizam was persuaded to underwrite an animal investigation into the safety of
chloroform anesthesia by Major Edward Lawrie, Principal of the Indian Medical School
in Hyderabad. Lawrie had preconceived belief in the safety of chloroform, and the
results of his studies understandably concluded that chloroform was entirely safe
if given according to his methods. The agent continued in use for several decades,
but its slow demise was initiated in 1894, when Leonard G. Guthrie[133]
reported on several cases of delayed chloroform hepatotoxicity in children. The
future use of chloroform anesthesia was doomed after the studies of A. Goodman Levy
[134]
(1856–1954), who demonstrated that the
combination of light chloroform anesthesia and adrenalin produced fatal ventricular
fibrillation in experimental animals, explaining the perplexing sudden demise of
several healthy subjects administered chloroform anesthetics.