CSF Shunting Procedures
CSF shunts are inserted for the relief of a variety of hydrocephalic
states and pseudotumor cerebri. Hydrocephalus can be communicating or noncommunicating.
In a noncommunicating hydrocephalus, CSF egress from the ventricular system is obstructed.
Such obstruction can occur as a result of blood or infection in the ventricular
system
or tumors in or adjacent to the ventricular system. In a communicating hydrocephalus,
CSF escapes from the ventricular system but is not absorbed by the arachnoid villi.
This occurs most commonly secondary to infection or blood in the CSF space. Some
degree of communicating hydrocephalus is particularly common after SAH.
The ventriculoperitoneal shunt is the most commonly used device.
Generally, a catheter is inserted through a bur hole into the frontal horn of the
lateral ventricle on the nondominant (usually the right) side. A reservoir is placed
subcutaneously adjacent to the bur hole, and the drainage limb passes through a subcutaneous
tunnel to a point near the epigastrium, where it is inserted into the peritoneal
space through a very small laparotomy. A moderate degree of muscle relaxation may
be helpful. A distended stomach can result in an inadvertent "gastrostomy." Occasionally,
most commonly in pediatric patients, there may be obstruction at more than one level
in the ventricular system, and a so-called double-barreled shunt becomes appropriate.
In this instance, there are two proximal ends: usually one in the lateral ventricle
and one in the fourth ventricle. This latter procedure is generally performed in
the prone position, whereas most ventriculoperitoneal shunts are performed in the
supine position.
Occasionally, when a communicating hydrocephalus is present, a
lumboperitoneal shunt is inserted. The patient is placed in a lateral position,
and a catheter is inserted into the lumbar CSF space with the use of a Tuohy-type
needle. The catheter is then tunneled subcutaneously around to the anterior abdominal
wall and inserted into the peritoneal space through a small laparotomy.
In the past, ventriculoatrial shunts were used, although they
have largely been abandoned because of the occurrence of pulmonary embolism. For
these shunts, the noncerebral end is inserted into the venous system through the
jugular vein. The atrial location of the noncerebral end is confirmed by using the
same ECG technique that is used to place VAE recovery catheters (see the section
"Venous Air Embolism").
Anesthetic Management
Invasive monitoring is not generally required. The anesthetic
technique should be chosen to avoid further increases in ICP. Moderate hyperventilation
(PaCO2
of 25 to 30) is customary. However,
aggressive ICP reduction measures are not warranted because collapsing the ventricles
may render them more difficult to "hit" with the ventricular catheter. The procedure
is usually performed in the supine position, with the table turned 90 degrees and
the head turned toward the anesthesiologist. Blood pressure may drop abruptly (as
brainstem pressure is relieved) when the ventricle is first cannulated. Infrequently,
brief pressor support is required. Burrowing the subcutaneous tunnel can produce
a sudden painful stimulus. Postoperative discomfort is only minor.
Unlike most neurosurgical patients, shunt patients are often nursed
flat after their procedures in an attempt to prevent excessively rapid collapse of
the ventricular system. Empirically, there is a small incidence of subdural hematoma
after shunting, and tearing of the bridging veins at the time of rapid brain shrinkage
is a suspected cause.
Pediatric Ventriculoperitoneal Shunts
Shunts are probably more commonly performed in children than adults.
Common indications are hydrocephalus occurring in association with meningomyelocele,
neonatal intraventricular hemorrhage, and posterior fossa tumors. Although one can
never be casual about the management of these patients, open fontanelles seem to
provide some margin for error in younger patients, and in addition, palpation of
the fontanelles provides on-line trend monitoring of "ICP." In spite of the theoretical
considerations, induction with volatile anesthetics is empirically well tolerated,
even in children with closed fontanelles. However, we would avoid that induction
technique in a child who was already stuporous. When an intravenous line is available,
we generally use a propofolrelaxant induction sequence. For children in whom cannulation
of a peripheral vein cannot be accomplished readily, induction with inhaled sevoflurane
is a common approach, with initiation of controlled ventilation by bag and mask as
rapidly as possible. If in the absence of sevoflurane, halothane were used for induction,
immediately after loss of consciousness we would generally change to isoflurane and
control the ventilation manually. After establishing controlled ventilation, an
ideal course at this point is to establish an intravenous line, administer a muscle
relaxant (with or without atropine according to your biases) and perhaps an induction
drug, and intubate the patient in these optimal circumstances. Anesthesia is most
commonly maintained thereafter with 60% to 70% nitrous oxide, mechanical hyperventilation,
and isoflurane or sevoflurane as required. For children in excess of 6 months of
age who were not stuporous at the outset, we commonly administer 2 to 3 µg/kg
of fentanyl in the belief that this procedure is not entirely pain-free postoperatively
and, in addition, that a smoother emergence can be accomplished with a narcotic background.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59011/5901169aab113157dbcccae13d8a3fa98f68c376" alt="" |