ANESTHESIA FOR INTERVENTIONAL OR DIAGNOSTIC CARDIAC
PROCEDURES
Advances in interventional and diagnostic cardiac catheterization
techniques are significantly changing the operative and nonoperative approach to
the patient with a congenital heart defect. Nonoperative interventional techniques
are being used instead of procedures requiring surgery and CPB for safe closure of
secundum ASDs, VSDs, and PDAs. Stenotic aortic and pulmonic valves, recurrent aortic
coarctations, and branch pulmonary artery stenoses can be dilated in the catheterization
lab, avoiding surgical intervention.[255]
[256]
[257]
[258]
These
techniques shorten the hospital stay and are particularly beneficial to patients
with recurrent coarctation and muscular or apical VSDs, who are at a higher risk
of operative intervention. Many patients with complex cardiac defects are poor operative
risks. Innovative interventional procedures improve vascular anatomy, reduce pressure
loads on ventricles, and decrease the operative risk for these patients. For example,
in tetralogy of Fallot with
hypoplastic pulmonary arteries, balloon angioplasty and vascular stenting procedures
create favorable pulmonary artery anatomy and reduce pulmonary artery pressure and
right ventricular end-diastolic pressure. High-risk patients undergoing diagnostic
evaluation of pulmonary artery hypertension in anticipation of heart-lung transplantation
also require anesthetic management. Despite the attendant high risks of the procedure
in patients with suprasystemic right ventricular pressure, these patients are best
managed with general anesthesia and controlled ventilation.
Anesthetic management of interventional or diagnostic procedures
in the catheterization laboratory must include the same level of preparation that
applies in caring for these patients in the operating room. These patients have
the same complex cardiac physiology and, in some cases, greater physiologic complexity
and less cardiovascular reserves. Interventional catheterization procedures can
impose acute pressure load on the heart during balloon inflation. Large catheters
placed across mitral or tricuspid valves create acute valvular regurgitation or,
in the case of a small valve orifice, transient valvular stenosis. When catheters
are placed across shunts, severe reductions in pulmonary blood flow and marked hypoxemia
may occur.[258]
[259]
The anesthetic plan must consider the specific cardiology objectives of the procedure
and the impact of anesthetic management in facilitating or hindering the interventional
procedure. In general, there are three distinct periods involved in an interventional
catheterization: the data acquisition period, the interventional period, and the
post-procedural evaluation period.
During the data acquisition period, the cardiologist performs
a hemodynamic catheterization to evaluate the need for and extent of the planned
intervention. Catheterization data are obtained under normal physiologic conditions;
that is, room air, physiologic PaCO2
,
and spontaneous ventilation are preferred. Increased FIO2
or changes in PaCO2
may obscure physiologic
data. During the procedural period, the patient is usually intubated and mechanically
ventilated. A secured airway allows the anesthesiologist to concentrate on hemodynamic
issues. Positive-pressure ventilation also reduces the risk of air embolism. During
spontaneous ventilation, a large reduction in intrathoracic pressure can entrain
air into vascular sheaths and result in moderate to large pulmonary or systemic air
emboli. Precise device placement is also facilitated with muscle relaxants that
eliminate patient movements and controlled ventilation, thereby reducing the respiratory
shifting of cardiac structures. Substantial blood loss and changes in ventricular
function occur commonly during the intervention. Blood volume replacement and inotropic
support may be necessary during or immediately after the interventional procedure.
In the postprocedural period, the success and the physiologic
impact of the intervention are evaluated. Blood pressure, mixed venous oxygen saturation,
ventricular end-diastolic pressure, and cardiac output, when available, are used
to assess the impact of the intervention. Persistent severe hemodynamic derangement
indicates the need for ICU monitoring and respiratory or cardiovascular support.
Because of the hemodynamic variability of many of these patients, as well as changing
anesthetic requirements, continuous intravenous infusion with ketamine/midazolam
or propofol is appropriate. Potent inhaled anesthetics are generally not used as
the primary anesthetic and are reserved for adjunctive anesthesia.
A brief description of some of the interventional procedures and
the associated anesthetic implications follows. The success of these interventions
will undoubtedly result in widespread availability and use over the next few years.
Transcatheter Technique for Atrial Septal Defect Closures
In the transcatheter technique for ASD closures, a collapsed double-umbrella
clamshell device is loaded into a large introducer sheath placed through the femoral
vein, advanced to the right atrium, and placed across the ASD into the left atrial
chamber. Each side of the device consists of a Dacron mesh patch suspended in six
spring-loaded arms that open like an automatic umbrella. Using biplane fluoroscopy
and TEE, the catheter is positioned in the left atrium away from the mitral valve.
[257]
The sheath is pulled back to open the six
distal arms and its Dacron mesh cover into the left atrium. The sheath and device
are then pulled back so the distal arms contact the left atrial septum. Fluoroscopy
and TEE are used to confirm that the arms are on the left atrial side and do not
interfere with mitral valve motion. Once adequately seated, the sheath is pulled
further back to expose the proximal side of the device and the proximal arms, which
spring open to engage the right side of the atrial septum. When proper positioning
is certain, the device is released.[257]
In a review
of 122 children undergoing transcatheter ASD closures, there was a 9% incidence of
procedural complications that resulted in hemodynamic complications requiring treatment.
[258]
Despite nearly a decade of experience, these devices remain under
investigational protocol and are therefore available only at a limited number of
study centers.