Previous Next

Monitoring

All patients undergoing cardiac surgery require basic monitoring plus invasive arterial pressure monitoring and central venous line placement. The latter is used to monitor central venous pressure and as a conduit for volume and pharmacologic resuscitation. Pulmonary artery catheter use in patients undergoing cardiac surgery has spurred enormous debate and a generous literature[168] [169] [170] [171] [172] [173] [174] [175] [176] [177] [178] related to its cost-benefit ratio, which is defined especially by modulation of outcome. It is reasonable to conclude


1969

TABLE 50-10 -- Preoperative evaluation
Surgical procedure—indication for surgery
Risk factors for cardiovascular disease and their implications for comorbid disease (e.g., cigarette use, hypertension, diabetes)
Functional status
  Symptoms and signs
  New York Heart Association classification
    Cardiac symptoms but no limitation in physical activity
    Cardiac symptoms and slight limitation in physical activity
    Cardiac symptoms and marked limitation in physical activity
    Cardiac symptoms preclude physical activity
Basic investigative data
  Electrocardiogram—ischemia, infarction, conduction abnormalities, hypertrophy, drug effects
  Hematologic/coagulation and electrolyte data, including especially the prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time, platelet count, glucose, and creatinine
Specialized investigative data
  Ischemia—exercise stress tests, myocardial perfusion imaging (rest, exercise, pharmacologic), angiography
  Myocardial function/valve function—hemodynamics (cardiac output, pressure gradients, valve areas), ventriculography, echocardiography
Preoperative medications
Airway
Systemic disease
  Cerebrovascular diseases (± duplex studies)
  Atherosclerotic aortic disease
  Renal impairment
  Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

that routine use of pulmonary artery catheters is not necessary in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Their use should be at the discretion of the practitioner and based on the patient's underlying condition (e.g., poor ventricular function, elevated pulmonary vascular pressures) and the specifics of the surgery being contemplated (longer, complex procedures). The timing (preinduction versus postinduction) of insertion of invasive lines is also based on judgment and dictated by the physician and the patient's condition. It may be reasonable to place all such lines post-induction in some patients and, conversely, preinduction in others (patient tolerance of the Trendelenburg position, need for vascular access). In most patients, some in-between variation (arterial lines, preinduction; central lines, postinduction) may be appropriate.


TABLE 50-11 -- Premedications for cardiac surgery
Class Drug Dose (mg) Dose by Weight (mg/kg) Route
Opioids Morphine 5–15 0.2 IM

Meperidine 50–100 1.0–1.5 IM
Benzodiazepines Diazepam 5–10 0.1–0.15 PO, IM

Lorazepam 2–4 0.03–0.06 PO, IM

Midazolam 2.5–5 0.03–0.07 IM
Anticholinergic Scopolamine 0.3–0.6 0.006 IM
Phenothiazine Perphenazine 2.5–5 0.03–0.07 IM
α2 -Agonist Clonidine 0.5 5 µg/kg PO
From Cheng D, Vegas A: Anesthesia for the surgical management of ischemic heart disease. In Thys DM (ed): Textbook of Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology. New York, McGraw-Hill, 2001, pp 530–588. Copyright © by McGraw-Hill, Inc. Used by permission of McGraw-Hill Book Company.

The use of TEE as a monitoring tool has also been cast in the context of cost-benefit ratio. It is reasonable at a minimum to use TEE in patients undergoing valve procedures and those with compromised ventricular function. TEE is also extremely and uniquely useful in assessing atherosclerotic disease of the aorta ( Table 50-12 , Fig. 50-30 )[179] and, thus, optimizing aortic cannula placement and dictating the surgical approach (off-pump coronary artery bypass [OPCAB] versus CPB, proximal vein grafting anastomosis with aortic cross-clamp on, minimizing the number of proximal grafts/using side grafts or jump grafts). In other patients, the decision to use TEE is one of clinical judgment. Many centers have now extended this concept to epiaortic ultrasonography mapping, which is not limited by an "acoustic window"


1970

TABLE 50-12 -- Five-stage echocardiographic grading of aortic wall disease
No or mild intimal thickening Grade I
Severe intimal thickening without protruding atheroma Grade II
Atheroma protruding <5.0 mm into the lumen Grade III
Atheroma protruding 5.0 mm or more in the lumen Grade IV
Mobile atheroma of any size Grade V
From Nan Y, Mysore S, Hillel Z: Echocardiography. In Thys DM (ed): Textbook of Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology. New York, McGraw-Hill, 2001, pp 119–181. Copyright © by McGraw-Hill, Inc. Used by permission of McGraw-Hill Book Company.

(as is TEE) and has been demonstrated to be superior to other methods of accessing atheromas.[180]

Previous Next